From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263280AbTKEXUE (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2003 18:20:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263281AbTKEXUE (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2003 18:20:04 -0500 Received: from mail-08.iinet.net.au ([203.59.3.40]:22712 "HELO mail.iinet.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263280AbTKEXUA (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Nov 2003 18:20:00 -0500 Message-ID: <3FA984C4.1030504@cyberone.com.au> Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 10:16:20 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030827 Debian/1.4-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel Subject: Re: lmbench context switch regression References: <3FA8ECF0.8020800@cyberone.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3FA8ECF0.8020800@cyberone.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > Hi, > I'm seeing quite a large context switch speed regression as reported > by lmbench when I patched from test9 to test9-mm2. > > The obvious thing I can see from the patch is the PF_DEAD > finish_task_switch > change. I don't have time to investigate further tonight though. > > lmbench two 0 sized processes context switch times go from around > 1.80us to > 2.60us on my PIII 650 (UP). The regression is smaller when going from test9 to test9-bk. About .2us (10%). It does not go away when reverting the PF_DEAD change. Maybe its just lucky alignment?