From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out.tiscali.be (spoolo2.tiscali.be [62.235.13.211]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE494841 for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2003 15:36:26 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <3FAD6FF8.80904@tiscali.be> Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 22:36:40 +0000 From: Joel Soete MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Carlos O'Donell Cc: parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] fork failed? protection id trap. All suspect. References: <3F969FFE00005DB3@ocpmta2.freegates.net> <3FACE5A4.7070003@tiscali.be> <20031108155247.GC21080@systemhalted> <3FAD5C01.7040302@tiscali.be> <20031108220923.GK21080@systemhalted> In-Reply-To: <20031108220923.GK21080@systemhalted> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 09:11:29PM +0000, Joel Soete wrote: [...] >> >>request_module[net-pf-10]: fork failed, errno 1 >>evolution (pid 879): Protection id trap (code 27) >> >> YZrvWESTHLNXBCVMcbcbcbcbOGFRQPDI >>PSW: 00000000000001000000000000001111 Not tainted >>r00-03 00000000 103b7524 1015352c 00282b28 >>r04-07 00000000 00000000 00000001 11f27da0 >>r08-11 00000000 00000001 13084548 fffffff2 >>r12-15 419ee608 419ee718 419345a8 419345a8 >>r16-19 419ee608 419345a8 00000070 1371d000 >>r20-23 00000000 00000002 00282b2e 00000000 >>r24-27 11f27da0 00000000 10d0b520 10304010 >>r28-31 00000000 10314a60 130845c0 101532c8 >>sr0-3 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000003 >>sr4-7 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 >> >>IASQ: 00000000 00000000 IAOQ: 10153658 1015365c >> IIR: 0ed4d240 ISR: 00000003 IOR: 00282b2e >> CPU: 0 CR30: 13084000 CR31: 103a8000 >> ORIG_R28: 419345a8 >> >>----------><---------- > > > I've never seen this perhaps some kernelish people would like to comment > on this? > it is also possible that my merge broken something (but not enough time to check with original cvs, compiling a kernel with c110 is a long job :( ) btw i will try to see how (where) attaching "the thread that is going to die." Thanks a lot, Joel