From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out.tiscali.be (spoolo2.tiscali.be [62.235.13.211]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E36483E for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 12:23:05 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <3FAFE5AC.60900@tiscali.be> Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 19:23:24 +0000 From: Joel Soete MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Grant Grundler Cc: parisc-linux Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] C110 builtin nic slow? References: <3F969FFE00009E0B@ocpmta2.freegates.net> <3F969FFE00009EA4@ocpmta2.freegates.net> <20031110173748.GD24664@colo.lackof.org> In-Reply-To: <20031110173748.GD24664@colo.lackof.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Grant Grundler wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:31:45PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > >>ie a Lasi_82596 (as Matthew mentioned in a previous mail). > > > yeah - that's not going to perform as well as tulip. > And 10-Half is going to be substantially slower. > Sounds like it has a bug in the negotiation. Hmm I could verify, i would have to had ethtool support. btw is somebody knows a driver which support it (i test without succes 3com an hp100 driver). Thx, Joel