From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out.tiscali.be (spoolo2.tiscali.be [62.235.13.211]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A44C483E for ; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 04:45:36 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <3FB0CBF4.6010306@tiscali.be> Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:45:56 +0000 From: Joel Soete MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "M. Grabert" Cc: Grant Grundler , parisc-linux Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] C110 builtin nic slow? References: <3F969FFE00009E0B@ocpmta2.freegates.net> <3F969FFE00009EA4@ocpmta2.freegates.net> <20031110173748.GD24664@colo.lackof.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Sender: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org Errors-To: parisc-linux-admin@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Hi Max, M. Grabert wrote: > On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Grant Grundler wrote: > > >>On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:31:45PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: >> >>>ie a Lasi_82596 (as Matthew mentioned in a previous mail). >> >>yeah - that's not going to perform as well as tulip. >>And 10-Half is going to be substantially slower. >>Sounds like it has a bug in the negotiation. > > > Very likely! > > My C200 is also very picky whether to enable 100MBit or not. > I'm using a no-name 100MBit-Switch, and it works fine for all > 5 other PCs in my house). > > I was not able to force 100MBit by changing the settings in the > PDC, but the following DID work: > > >>mii-tool -A 100baseTx,10baseT eth0 > Ah interesting: on my pc, # mii-tool SIOCGMIIPHY on 'eth0' failed: Operation not supported eth1: 10 Mbit, half duplex, no link and eth1 is the nic I use to connect my c110 :) (don't see what no link means but that is the right setup that I need with c110) otc on the c110: # mii-tool SIOCGMIIPHY on 'eth0' failed: Operation not supported no MII interfaces found :( Thx a lot, Joel