From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: porting to alternate OSs and relational semantics
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 07:57:34 -0800
Message-ID: <3FB3A9EE.8060209@namesys.com>
References: <20031113201925.GB1423@europa.lair> <3FB35BE1.2080006@namesys.com> <20031113230610.GC1705@europa.lair>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-16083-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <20031113230610.GC1705@europa.lair>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Phil Frost <indigo@bitglue.com>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Phil Frost wrote:

>
>
>Yes, that's what I mean. As a new OS with no notions of compatibility or
>tradition we'd rather have the right system initially rather than to regress
>later. I'd like to know if any such development is activly in progress, and
>if so, when it is estimated to be serviceable. Or if you prefer, what would
>be involved time-wise to implement it given the current state? As we are
>already working on such a project, with a little perswasion I'm might get a
>developer in addition to myself working towards that goal.
>
>
>  
>
Status is: storage layer is stabilizing now for v4.0, semantics 
development will be the next major release, asssuming we get funding for 
it....

-- 
Hans