All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeffrey Laramie <JALaramie@Loudoun-Fairfax.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: iptables questions
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 09:07:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FB8D61F.7050005@Loudoun-Fairfax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <003601c3ab66$7396c360$2178df50@lanzor2k.com>

Antti Korpela wrote:

> Hi,
>  
> I have here some questions and i hope you have some time to answer
>  
> 1. What difference and which is better between: iptables -t nat -j 
> MASQUERADE or SNAT --to IP if im using it for internet gateway 
> NAT-machine in big LAN-parties, over 300 IP:s.

According to Oskar's tutorial SNAT is preferable for static IPs:

> It is still possible to use the *MASQUERADE* target instead of *SNAT* 
> even though you do have an static IP, however, it is not favorable 
> since it will add extra overhead, and there may be inconsistencies in 
> the future which will thwart your existing scripts and render them 
> "unusable".
>

> 2. I have get this error often "too much work on eth0, dropping 
> packet..." what this mean? do i have to put this on kernel:
> echo "65000" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_conntrack_max ? is there any 
> other solutions for this ?

Can't help with this.

> 3. Do you have some other tips for MASQ ? :)


SNAT is pretty straightforward and there aren't a lot of configuration 
choices. It's a good idea to read all of Oskar's tutorial, but you 
should at least read and understand this section:

http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/chunkyhtml/targets.html#SNATTARGET

Jeff




  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-17 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-15 10:51 iptables questions Antti Korpela
2003-11-17 14:07 ` Jeffrey Laramie [this message]
2003-11-17 14:18   ` Antony Stone
2003-11-19 15:32     ` Cedric Blancher
2003-11-18  1:12 ` William Stearns
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-26 23:33 james li
2002-11-27  0:08 ` Joel Newkirk
     [not found] <023d01c1ae2b$f0f417c0$9d264484@cs.technion.ac.il>
     [not found] ` <20020219212055.M22074@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org>
     [not found]   ` <03ce01c1eae8$d580e0f0$9d264484@cmp41>
     [not found]     ` <20020423190905.X27024@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org>
     [not found]       ` <011001c221c1$32508e20$9b264484@cmp41>
2002-07-02 21:05         ` Harald Welte
2000-08-13  6:00 jingai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FB8D61F.7050005@Loudoun-Fairfax.com \
    --to=jalaramie@loudoun-fairfax.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.