From: Keith Whyte <keith@media-solutions.ie>
To: Edgar Toernig <froese@gmx.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gcc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-admin@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.18 fork & defunct child.
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:26:00 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FB96718.20103@media-solutions.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FB8E40F.EF61CA7@gmx.de>
Edgar Toernig wrote:
{ strace listing deleted, see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106905386725308&w=2 }
>That is not normal /bin/true behaviour. Sure your system
>isn't hacked? Give the -f option to ptrace to see what the
>forked process is trying to do... Compare the size of
>/bin/true with a known-good one.
>
>Ciao, ET.
>
I'm not sure. I should be running tripwire or something, this is the
only one of my systems that doesn't run such a thing, as i have the
firewall locked down and have been busy.
But it is true i accidently did iptables -F and it was left that way for
a few days.
But this happens with any program, not just /bin/true, also the
/bin/true on the root and chroot systems are identical. and with much
interest i discovered, that if i unmount /proc, the problem goes away. aggh.
that is why it is not exhibiting itself in the chroot system, - no /proc.
I also remember that when this first happen nearly a year ago, some
"unix engineer" at the ISP said, oh yeah that's because something in the
ext2 filesystem header is corrupted.. i don't quite remember what he
said exactly, something that sounded so far fetched that i ignored it.
does that ring any bells with anyone?
please help, ug, i hate having a linux system that's not reliable. feels
like having a pet that's in pain or something.
btw,
/lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.2.5.so
Keith
(i'm cross-posting here to gcc and admin in the hopes of finding someone
who has seen this, thanks!)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-18 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-17 7:18 2.4.18 fork & defunct child Keith Whyte
[not found] ` <3FB8E40F.EF61CA7@gmx.de>
2003-11-18 0:26 ` Keith Whyte [this message]
2003-11-18 1:00 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2003-11-18 1:00 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2003-11-18 10:39 ` 2.4.18 fork & defunct child => system is hacked Frank van Maarseveen
2003-11-19 19:45 ` Keith Whyte
2003-11-20 2:42 ` solution: 2.4.18 fork & defunct child Keith Whyte
[not found] ` <20031117184732.GA531@louise.pinerecords.com>
2003-11-18 0:41 ` Keith Whyte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FB96718.20103@media-solutions.ie \
--to=keith@media-solutions.ie \
--cc=froese@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-admin@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gcc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.