From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264110AbTKTXfp (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:35:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264112AbTKTXfp (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:35:45 -0500 Received: from mail-06.iinet.net.au ([203.59.3.38]:28335 "HELO mail.iinet.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264110AbTKTXfk (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:35:40 -0500 Message-ID: <3FBD4F6E.3030906@cyberone.com.au> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 10:34:06 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030827 Debian/1.4-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Markus_H=E4stbacka?= CC: Kernel Mailinglist Subject: Re: Nick's scheduler v19a References: <3FB62608.4010708@cyberone.com.au> <1069361130.13479.12.camel@midux> In-Reply-To: <1069361130.13479.12.camel@midux> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Markus Hästbacka wrote: >Hi nick! here's some feedback. >This one day last week, I thougt I could test your scheduler patch. >I noticed something really good with it. My X had really fast startup. >everything worked really fast. Even games worked much better than any in >kernel before (I've tested all from 2.5.74). > >So I hope you'll port this patch for test10> if this one wont patch >clearly. > Hi Markus, Thanks for testing. That sounds quite remarkable, is it possible that some other change has made the difference? What kernel version did you patch against, and did you try that same kernel and .config without my patch? Anyway, I'm glad you're having good results. Yes, this one will probably apply to test10 should it ever apper. If not I will port it. Nick