From: Juan Carlos Castro y Castro <jcastro@vialink.com.br>
To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: raw/NOTRACK + TARPIT = good idea?
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 19:55:53 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FBE89E9.1020307@vialink.com.br> (raw)
I'm thinking about the TARPIT target, and that it's a shame it will use resources if my box does conntrack. But if I previously pass them through -t raw -j NOTRACK, can I have the best of both worlds, i.e., a routing NAT box who is able to tarpit undesired packets itself?
next reply other threads:[~2003-11-21 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-21 21:55 Juan Carlos Castro y Castro [this message]
2003-11-24 8:11 ` raw/NOTRACK + TARPIT = good idea? Jozsef Kadlecsik
2003-12-02 4:38 ` IP v6
2003-12-02 9:13 ` Henrik Nordstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FBE89E9.1020307@vialink.com.br \
--to=jcastro@vialink.com.br \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.