From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262094AbTKVHnV (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Nov 2003 02:43:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262114AbTKVHnV (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Nov 2003 02:43:21 -0500 Received: from mail-03.iinet.net.au ([203.59.3.35]:43455 "HELO mail.iinet.net.au") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262094AbTKVHnU (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Nov 2003 02:43:20 -0500 Message-ID: <3FBF1393.9070604@cyberone.com.au> Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 18:43:15 +1100 From: Nick Piggin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030827 Debian/1.4-3 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel CC: "Martin J. Bligh" , John Hawkes Subject: Re: [PATCH][CFT] NUMA / SMP scheduler "improvements" References: <3FBF0CCF.7060401@cyberone.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3FBF0CCF.7060401@cyberone.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick Piggin wrote: > Hi everyone, > I would like people to test my scheduler improvements if possible, > if you are interested in that sort of thing. Patch at: > http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/w22/ snip > > The good metric is the number of tasks being pulled to another node > dbench pulls 72% > tbench pulls 0.28% So by this I mean that mainline pulled 59469 of their node during tbench tests, my patch pulled 171. I have some raw results here: http://www.kerneltrap.org/~npiggin/w22/results