All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gaël Deest" <GUtopiste@free.fr>
To: linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange segmentation fault with xlib / threads
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 23:52:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FCA749B.9000206@free.fr> (raw)

> Can you shared with us what was the problem.

> Thanks,


I declared, at the beginning of the main :

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {

pthread_t EventThread;
pthread_attr_t *EventThreadAttr;

with pthread_attr_t as a pointer to a a pthread_attr_t, which kind of
argument I had to pass later to the pthread_attr_init() function and
then to pthread_create(). Here are there prototypes :

int pthread_attr_init(pthread_attr_t *attr);
int pthread_create(pthread_t * thread, pthread_attr_t * attr, void *
(*start_routine)(void *), void * arg);

It was pretty useless to use the first one, I could have passed NULL as
argument in pthread_create, which would have created a concurrent
thread with the default parameters, what was the case because I didn't
modify my EventThreadAttr later.
Anyway, I simply forgot to initialize some memory for my
*EventThreadAttr, which of course caused a segmentation fault. One can
simply correct this with :

EventThreadAttr=(pthread_attr_t*)malloc(sizeof(pthread_attr_t));

I was not very logic with myself, because I used a pointer for an
argument (EventThreadAttr) and a solid variable for another one
(EventThread).

I think my program worked with an additional variable because by
enlarging its memory environment, it got access to the memory
pthread_attr_init() and pthread_create() tried to access. Which hid the
problem... It may also be interesting to know that using gcc
optimization simply deleted the problem, until the user closed the
window, when I got another strange message (don't remember what.)



             reply	other threads:[~2003-11-30 22:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-30 22:52 Gaël Deest [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-30 18:35 Strange segmentation fault with xlib / threads Gaël Deest
2003-11-30 21:07 ` Moshe Ashkenazi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FCA749B.9000206@free.fr \
    --to=gutopiste@free.fr \
    --cc=linux-c-programming@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.