From: mds@paradyne.com (Mark Studebaker)
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: lm_sensors2/prog/detect sensors-detect
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 06:24:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FCBF378.476899D1@paradyne.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021107235845.0037e195.khali@linux-fr.org>
Jean Delvare wrote:
>
>
> One additional note. In sensors-detect we scan all addresses from 0x00
> to 0x7F. I don't think it's correct. According to what I know, 0x00,
> 0x02-0x03, 0x0C and 0x7C-0x7F should not be scanned, being respectively
> the general call address, a reserved range, the alert response address
> and another reserved range. I propose to exclude these addresses from
> the scan. Then, all we need to do is add four addresses to the exclusion
> list if an IBM system is detected. This also opens a path for more
> addresses exclusions if this is needed later.
>
> Comments welcome.
agreed. this used to be on my to-do list.
i2c-core scans all addressess too which is even worse
than having userspace do it.
Actually it's not that bad to scan all the adresses,
it's just bad to probe them all with
each of the driver tests.
the worst one is 0x00. The others shouldn't really be a problem, I don't
think.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-19 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-19 6:23 lm_sensors2/prog/detect sensors-detect Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Jim Morris
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Jim Morris
2005-05-19 6:23 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jim Morris
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jim Morris
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jim Morris
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jim Morris
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jim Morris
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jim Morris
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark D. Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker [this message]
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Mark Studebaker
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
2005-05-19 6:24 ` Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FCBF378.476899D1@paradyne.com \
--to=mds@paradyne.com \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.