From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger Subject: Re: Bad root block 0. (--rebuild-tree did not complete) Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 22:17:54 +0100 Message-ID: <3FCD0182.3050206@gmx.net> References: <3FCCE7CA.7090306@inf.ethz.ch> <200312022306.49388.vitaly@namesys.com> <3FCCF5E4.8020908@inf.ethz.ch> <3FCCF88D.5050006@gmx.net> <3FCCFBDE.50909@inf.ethz.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <3FCCFBDE.50909@inf.ethz.ch> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Marc Schmitt Cc: Vitaly Fertman , ReiserFS-List Hi Marc, Marc Schmitt wrote: > > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > >> Marc Schmitt wrote: >> >>> [...] >>> >>> It is running now. I'll make the file metadata.bz2 available for >>> downloading asap. ETA is 10h, right, if the `reiserfsck --rebuild-tree` >>> took 10h before it segfaulted? >> >> No. More like a few minutes for disk accesses and some time for >> compressing the result. The command is of the "read all metadata and dump >> it without any additional checks whatsoever" variety. >> > Hmm, it's running for 15' now and it does not look like it's going to > finish soon: > [...] > Super block, bitmaps, journal - 13590 blocks - done, 162967267 blocks left > 0% left 161169318, > 1250 /sec > > The file metadata.bz2 is still growing. The 1250 /sec increased slowly > during fsck and went up to 6000 /sec towards the end. At the current > pace, it would take 36h... Sorry, I totally underestimated your disk_size/transfer_rate ratio. Your disks are probably 1000x larger than mine (4GB), but not 1000x faster. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/