From: "Prakash K. Cheemplavam" <prakashpublic@gmx.de>
To: bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11)
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 18:37:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FCE1F64.6020602@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200312031709.MAA18860@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
bill davidsen wrote:
> In article <3FCD32F5.2050002@gmx.de>,
> Prakash K. Cheemplavam <prakashkc@gmx.de> wrote:
> | > smp off, preempt off. lapic on, apic on, acpi on
> |
> | Why haven't you enabled preempt? Does it lock with preempt on?
>
[snip]
> Have you seen a benefit from preempt? And if so, what application and
> how much? I may not be doing anything which benefits from preempt enough
> to notice (news, mail and dns servers, desktops), but other than dns on
> 2.4 I haven't seen improvement.
>
> enlightenmet, please?
Well, I am fairly new to Linux. Only since a month or so I am regurlarly
using Linux and only since 2.6 kernel. I always used preempt and had no
problems. The only problem I have, is with APIC. 2.6 is very smooth for
me. I don't know whether it is because of preempt or not. I just was
curious, why Craig didn't use it and whether the is a connection.
Prakash
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-03 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3FCD21E1.5080300@netzentry.com>
2003-12-03 0:28 ` NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11) Craig Bradney
2003-12-03 0:48 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2003-12-03 8:15 ` Craig Bradney
2003-12-03 17:09 ` bill davidsen
[not found] ` <200312031709.MAA18860@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
2003-12-03 17:37 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam [this message]
2003-12-03 0:47 ` Ian Kumlien
2003-12-04 13:07 Dan Creswell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-04 12:17 b
2003-12-04 15:19 ` Craig Bradney
2003-12-04 16:32 ` Josh McKinney
2003-12-04 17:08 ` Julien Oster
2003-12-04 17:55 ` Josh McKinney
2003-12-05 13:28 ` Pat Erley
2003-12-04 9:09 b
2003-12-04 8:59 b
2003-12-04 5:37 b
2003-12-04 7:00 ` Craig Bradney
2003-12-04 5:11 Allen Martin
2003-12-04 20:04 ` Jesse Allen
2003-12-04 20:41 ` Craig Bradney
2003-12-04 20:55 ` Craig Bradney
2003-12-04 22:03 ` Bob
2003-12-04 2:57 b
2003-12-04 1:41 b
2003-12-04 2:45 ` Jesse Allen
2003-12-04 7:42 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2003-12-04 4:45 ` Josh McKinney
2003-12-04 11:47 ` ross.alexander
[not found] <fa.nmlihqm.16j6n38@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.f27m7i8.1vk0j84@ifi.uio.no>
2003-12-04 1:08 ` walt
2003-12-03 1:32 Allen Martin
2003-12-03 1:23 b
2003-12-03 1:30 ` Ian Kumlien
2003-12-03 0:58 Allen Martin
2003-12-03 1:09 ` Ian Kumlien
[not found] <WSA7.6D.39@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <WTYM.3ua.7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <WVoa.73O.17@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-11-30 13:06 ` Lenar Lõhmus
2003-11-29 10:25 bug in -test11 make xconfig Christopher Sawtell
2003-11-29 11:18 ` NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11) Craig Bradney
2003-11-29 16:34 ` Julien Oster
2003-11-29 16:47 ` Craig Bradney
2003-11-29 16:54 ` Craig Bradney
2003-12-07 11:32 ` Jussi Laako
2003-12-07 15:49 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2003-12-01 18:30 ` Pavel Machek
2003-12-01 20:20 ` Craig Bradney
[not found] <001a01c3b515$b6030de0$0f00a8c0@client.attbi.com>
2003-11-28 15:13 ` ross.alexander
2003-11-28 16:46 ` Alistair John Strachan
2003-11-28 18:13 ` Julien Oster
2003-11-28 18:24 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2003-11-29 2:55 ` Josh McKinney
2003-11-29 16:33 ` Julien Oster
2003-11-29 17:15 ` Josh McKinney
2003-12-02 10:13 ` ross.alexander
2003-12-02 21:12 ` Josh McKinney
2003-12-03 16:23 ` Julien Oster
2003-11-28 18:00 ` Julien Oster
2003-11-28 18:18 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FCE1F64.6020602@gmx.de \
--to=prakashpublic@gmx.de \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.