All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "b@netzentry.com" <b@netzentry.com>
To: recbo@nishanet.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11) - IRQ flood related ?
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:56:34 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FD01E12.4040801@netzentry.com> (raw)

I have almost everything disabled and the error occurs.

USB1 OFF
USB2 OFF
FireWire OFF
SATA - Jumpered OFF
AUDIO OFF
NVIDIA LAN OFF.

lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AGP (different
version?) (rev c1)
00:00.1 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 1
(rev c1)
00:00.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 4
(rev c1)
00:00.3 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 3
(rev c1)
00:00.4 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 2
(rev c1)
00:00.5 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 5
(rev c1)
00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 ISA Bridge (rev a4)
00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation nForce2 SMBus (MCP) (rev a2)
00:08.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 External PCI Bridge
(rev a3)
00:09.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation nForce2 IDE (rev a2)
00:0c.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 PCI Bridge (rev a3)
00:1e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AGP (rev c1)
01:07.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation Farallon
PN9000SX (rev 01)
01:08.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation Farallon
PN9000SX (rev 01)
02:01.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3C920B-EMB Integrated
Fast Ethernet Controller (rev 40)
03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV18
[GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x] (rev a2)

Thats it. And this think locks anytime APIC is enabled. Its just a
matter of time.


Bob wrote
 >(2.6.0-test11) - IRQ flood related ?
 >
 >
 >Do you have onboard ethernet enabled with nforce2
 >mboard? I am fine with pre-emptive kernel but have
 >to disable onboard ethernet in cmos setup or I see
 >"Disabling IRQ7" and problems develop.
 >
 >-Bob
 >
 >Craig Bradney wrote:
 >
 >>Prakash,
 >>
 >>try it without preempt.. just to see. As soon as I removed it
 >today the
 >>crashes went away (for 5 hours).. PC is now up for 2.5 hours and I'm
 >>waiting to see if it will be 5 hrs or 5 days this time around :)
 >>
 >>Craig
 >>
 >>On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 00:14, Prakash K. Cheemplavam wrote:
 >>
 >>
 >>>Jesse Allen wrote:
 >>>
 >>>
 >>>>On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:02:08PM +0100,

 >>>>
 >>>>
 >>>>
 >>>>>Hello,
 >>>>>
 >>>>>Along with the lockups already described here, I've noticed an
 >>>>>unidentified source of interrupts on IRQ7.
 >>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>...
 >>>>
 >>>>
 >>>>
 >>>>>I wonder if people experiencing lockup problems also have these
 >>>>>noise interrupts,
 >>>>>
 >>>>>
 >>>>I just took a look at this, by setting up parport_pc, and
 >yes I get noise.
 >>>>
 >>>>This was my first sample with a kernel with APIC:
 >>>>  7:      29230    IO-APIC-edge  parport0
 >>>>
 >>>>
 >>>I just did an experiment with a very light kernel, nearly nothing
 >>>compiled inside, except apic acpi, preempt and needed stuff plus
 >>>scsi+libata and no ide. IRQ 7 was not present and every
 >device had its
 >>>own irq. Nevertheless system locked up at second hdparm run...
 >>>
 >>>Prakash
 >>>
 >>>
 >>
 >
 >



             reply	other threads:[~2003-12-05  5:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-05  5:56 b [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-04 12:17 NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11) b
2003-12-04 15:19 ` Craig Bradney
2003-12-04 16:32   ` Josh McKinney
2003-12-04 17:08     ` Julien Oster
2003-12-04 17:55       ` Josh McKinney
2003-12-04 20:02         ` NForce2 pseudoscience stability testing (2.6.0-test11) - IRQ flood related ? cheuche+lkml
2003-12-04 20:48           ` Bob
2003-12-04 23:05           ` Jesse Allen
2003-12-04 23:14             ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2003-12-04 23:21               ` Craig Bradney
2003-12-04 23:36                 ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2003-12-05  5:47                 ` Bob
2003-12-05  7:01                   ` Craig Bradney
2003-12-05 12:33                   ` Prakash K. Cheemplavam
2003-12-05  8:16           ` cheuche+lkml

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FD01E12.4040801@netzentry.com \
    --to=b@netzentry.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=recbo@nishanet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.