From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Reiser Subject: Re: More on Hard Links (was A bold idea (Re: Carrying Attributes too Far)) Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 18:58:40 +0300 Message-ID: <3FD0AB30.6060305@namesys.com> References: <2342084747-BeMail@cr593174-a> <3FD0912C.1090700@ninja.dynup.net> <16336.37772.88198.217245@laputa.namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <16336.37772.88198.217245@laputa.namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Nikita Danilov Cc: David Masover , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Nikita Danilov wrote: > But if multiple hard-links to the directories >are allowed, file system is an arbitrary graph. It makes little sense to >try to stretch reference counting to work in this situation. There are >much more efficient forms of garbage collection for this. > >Nikita. > > > > Educate us, I am curious. -- Hans