From: Bob <recbo@nishanet.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NForce2: 2.6.0-test11-bk6 UP high interrupt error count with lapic noapic
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 22:40:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FD695AA.7050508@nishanet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF4915FCD8.D666BBDD-ON80256DF7.0042F69B-80256DF7.004BFBE8@uk.neceur.com>
These are typical nforce2 errors, along with lock-ups--
hdc: drive_cmd: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hdc: drive_cmd: error=0x04Aborted Command
hdd: drive_cmd: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete Error }
hdd: drive_cmd: error=0x04Aborted Command
spurious 8259A interrupt: IRQ7
The following in your log do NOT mean apic edge timer is on!---
Using local APIC timer interrupts.
calibrating APIC timer ...
...you can see apic edge timer is NOT on--PIC timer is on--
/proc/interrupts ****
CPU0
0: 5846081 XT-PIC timer
it can't be on because--
# CONFIG_ACPI is not set
turn on acpi and
turn on ioapic edge timer by patches--(from Jesse Allen, see
two patches appended below, he observes that he can now
use cpu disconnect and nmi_watchdog=1 instead of =2,
with these and not the first round, and I have to use =2
with the first round of patch, so I am going to these two)
-Bob D
ross.alexander@uk.neceur.com wrote:
>To all long suffering users,
>
>I have just compiled linux-2.6.0-test11-bk6 (this has the SMI correction).
> This "seams" to
>fix the the locking problem but only time will tell for sure. I have not
>applied any of the
>APIC patches and I'm getting very high error counts (presumably because
>the interval timers
>are playing up). For example the IRQ0/LOC count is ~ 6M the ERR is ~ 1M.
>Below is a dump
>of various details. I can provide more if necessary. I do have a couple
>of questions about
>interval timers.
>
>1. It is necessary to have both the APIC timer and the 8254 timer running
>simuntanously.
>2. Can the 8254 timer be disabled if the APIC timer is running.
>3. What stops each timer interrupting each other.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Ross
>
Hi Ross,
I have rediffed your two patches for vanilla 2.6.0-test11. Briefly, I tried the apic patch first, and found that there are no lockups so far; well it passed my grep tests and even a kernel compile =). Then I tried your io_apic patch + apic patch. With nmi_watchdog=1 "NMI:" in /proc/interrupts increments alot compared to nmi_watchdog=2 before (as much as the timer). So I believe your two patches are more correct than the other two. Especially the fact I can run with CPU Disconnect and not lock up just like windows ... for people that have windows (I dont have windows =) plus a probably working nmi_watchdog.
And for comparison, my setup:
Shuttle AN35N Ultra v 1.1 (Nforce2 400 ultra), bios updated
Athlon Barton 2600+ (1.9 Ghz)
256 MB PC3200, single stick.
The patches are included in this mail. I suppose the next thing to do is get out of nvidia the corresponding information. And then clean up the patch for inclusion.
Jesse
--- linux/arch/i386/kernel/apic.c 2003-10-25 11:44:59.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-jla/arch/i386/kernel/apic.c 2003-12-09 19:07:19.000000000 -0700
@@ -1089,6 +1089,16 @@
*/
irq_stat[cpu].apic_timer_irqs++;
+#ifdef CONFIG_MK7 && CONFIG_BLK_DEV_AMD74XX
+
+ /*
+ * on 2200XP & nforce2 chipset we need at least 500ns delay here
+ * to stop lockups with udma100 drive. try to scale delay time
+ * with cpu speed. Ross Dickson.
+ */
+ ndelay((cpu_khz >> 12)+200 ); /* don't ack too soon or hard lockup */
+#endif
+
/*
* NOTE! We'd better ACK the irq immediately,
* because timer handling can be slow.
--- linux/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c 2003-10-25 11:43:20.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-jla/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c 2003-12-09 19:56:07.000000000 -0700
@@ -2128,6 +2128,41 @@
printk(KERN_ERR "..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC\n");
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT && CONFIG_X86_UP_IOAPIC
+ /* for nforce2 try vector 0 on pin0
+ * Note the io_apic_set_pci_routing call disables the 8259 irq 0
+ * so we must be connected directly to the 8254 timer if this works
+ * Note2: this violates the above comment re Subtle but works!
+ */
+ printk(KERN_INFO "..TIMER: Is timer irq0 connected to IOAPIC Pin0? ...\n");
+ if ( pin1 != -1 && nr_ioapics ) {
+ int saved_timer_ack = timer_ack;
+ /* next call also disables 8259 irq0 */
+ int result = io_apic_set_pci_routing ( 0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+ /*
+ * Ok, does IRQ0 through the IOAPIC work?
+ */
+ unmask_IO_APIC_irq(0);
+ timer_ack = 0 ;
+ if (timer_irq_works()) {
+ if (nmi_watchdog == NMI_IO_APIC) {
+ disable_8259A_irq(0);
+ setup_nmi();
+ enable_8259A_irq(0);
+ check_nmi_watchdog();
+ }
+ printk(KERN_INFO "..TIMER: works OK on apic pin0 irq0\n" );
+ return;
+ }
+ /* failed */
+ timer_ack = saved_timer_ack;
+ clear_IO_APIC_pin(0, 0);
+ result = io_apic_set_pci_routing ( 0, pin1, 0, 0, 0);
+ printk(KERN_ERR "..MP-BIOS bug: 8254 timer not connected to IO-APIC Pin 0\n");
+ }
+#endif
+/* end new stuff for nforce2 */
+
printk(KERN_INFO "...trying to set up timer (IRQ0) through the 8259A ... ");
if (pin2 != -1) {
printk("\n..... (found pin %d) ...", pin2);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-10 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-09 13:49 NForce2: 2.6.0-test11-bk6 UP high interrupt error count with lapic noapic ross.alexander
2003-12-10 3:40 ` Bob [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FD695AA.7050508@nishanet.com \
--to=recbo@nishanet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.