From: Tom Dickson <tdickson@inostor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Bonding gigabit cards w 2.4.20 switch question
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 08:57:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FD7507E.30601@inostor.com> (raw)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I'm testing bonding e1000 cards under 2.4.20 and it seems to work fine,
however: I would like to know a decent brand of switch that can support
round-robin or XOR at gigabit speeds.
Documentation/networking/bonding.txt has only 10/100 information in it.
Is there any preferred linux supporting brand?
Also, should I submit a bug report on the fact that bonding using the
ns83820.o driver causes kernel panics, or is that a known issue?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-nr2 (Windows 2000)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQE/11B+2dxAfYNwANIRAsauAJ9iBMGtGcNWO4sjClQyCuaslJNGdACfRkYf
PlcVYJ+fmFcXFQe8FRoI9Rk=
=vp6a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
reply other threads:[~2003-12-10 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FD7507E.30601@inostor.com \
--to=tdickson@inostor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.