All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
To: Raul Miller <moth@magenta.com>
Cc: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
	Ed Sweetman <ed.sweetman@wmich.edu>,
	Donald Maner <donjr@maner.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Linux 2.6.0-test11 only lets me use 1GB out of 2GB ram.
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 16:48:51 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FD80543.8040905@cyberone.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031211054111.GX8039@holomorphy.com>



William Lee Irwin III wrote:

>On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 12:33:39AM -0500, Ed Sweetman wrote:
>
>>I thought highmem wasn't necesarily needed for memory <=2GB? Highmem 
>>incurs some performance hits doesn't it and so the urge to move to it 
>>with only 2GB is not very attractive.  Anyways i'm just interested in if 
>>that's the case or not since 2GB is easy to get to these days and i had 
>>heard that highmem could be avoided passed the 1GB barrier.
>>
>
>You're probably thinking of 2:2 split patches.
>
>2:2 splits are at least technically ABI violations, which is probably
>why this isn't merged etc. Applications sensitive to it are uncommon.
>
>Yes, the SVR4 i386 ELF/ABI spec literally mandates 0xC0000000 as the
>top of the process address space.
>

At any rate, Raul, highmem shouldn't hurt your performance significantly
with the 2.6 kernel. If it does then send a note to the list.

Your other options are a different user/kernel split, or a 64-bit kernel,
both of which should have less overhead than highmem.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-12-11  5:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-11  5:06 PROBLEM: Linux 2.6.0-test11 only lets me use 1GB out of 2GB ram Donald Maner
2003-12-11  5:13 ` Nick Piggin
2003-12-11  5:33   ` Ed Sweetman
2003-12-11  5:41     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-11  5:48       ` Roland Dreier
2003-12-11  5:50         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-11  5:48       ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2003-12-11  6:30       ` David Lang
2003-12-11  7:08       ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-11  7:19         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-11  7:22           ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-11 13:24         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-11 14:41       ` Raul Miller
2003-12-11 14:53         ` Raul Miller
2003-12-11 15:00         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-11 16:17           ` moth
2003-12-11 16:35             ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-11 19:26           ` Where did the ELF spec go? (SCO website?) Rob Landley
2003-12-11 19:44             ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-11 20:25               ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-12-12 11:11                 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2003-12-11  6:01 ` PROBLEM: Linux 2.6.0-test11 only lets me use 1GB out of 2GB ram Raul Miller
2003-12-11  6:12   ` Nick Piggin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-11  4:51 Raul Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FD80543.8040905@cyberone.com.au \
    --to=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=donjr@maner.org \
    --cc=ed.sweetman@wmich.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=moth@magenta.com \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.