From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wolfgang.grandegger@bluewin.ch>
To: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: 405 TLB miss reduction
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 11:37:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FD84905.5090802@bluewin.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3FD75312.7070701@embeddededge.com
On 12/10/2003 06:08 PM Dan Malek wrote:
> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>
>> ....We
>> can regain a few percent by using the kernel option CONFIG_PIN_TLB
>> but we are thinking about further kernel modifications to reduce
>> TLB misses. What comes into my mind is:
>
> If you have a large application I doubt any kernel modification
> will gain much. It's the application causing the huge amounts
> of tlb misses, you probably need to evaluate changes that will
> reduce that.
>
> It's always easy to pick on the kernel and make some changes
> becaue it is a very static and well behaved application. It
> seems your biggest performance increase would come from the
> analysis of the application and some redesign to improve its
> use of system resources.
We have been surprised, that CONFIG_PIN_TLB was able to reduce the page
miss rate already by approx. 40%. We are also working on the
optimization/tuning of our application and likely there we can gain more
than by further squeezing the TBL management of the Linux kernel, I agree.
Thanks.
Wolfgang.
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-11 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-10 14:43 405 TLB miss reduction Wolfgang Grandegger
2003-12-10 16:03 ` Matt Porter
2003-12-11 9:06 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2003-12-11 15:46 ` Dan Malek
2003-12-11 17:45 ` Matt Porter
2003-12-12 9:50 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2003-12-15 11:26 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2003-12-10 17:08 ` Dan Malek
2003-12-11 10:37 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
2003-12-11 16:48 ` Jon Masters
2003-12-11 16:56 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2003-12-11 17:06 ` Jon Masters
2003-12-11 17:36 ` Matt Porter
2003-12-11 16:44 ` Jon Masters
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FD84905.5090802@bluewin.ch \
--to=wolfgang.grandegger@bluewin.ch \
--cc=dan@embeddededge.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.