All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fernando Serboncini <fserb@campogeral.com.br>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RAID5 resync blocking on 2.6.0-test11
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:25:57 -0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FD90B15.8050905@campogeral.com.br> (raw)

Hi, I sent this e-mail to the LKML yesterday, that's when I found the 
linux-raid list. ;)

So hi, LinuxRaid

I've just installed a software-RAID 5 on my Alpha (miata) Workstation
500au with Kernel 2.6.0-test11. The RAID is made of 4 Western Digital
250Gb HDs on a promise-ata-133tx2.

The initial raidstart and mke2fs worked fine. After the initial sync, a
clean boot and a new raidstart, the /proc/mdstat reported that the drive
was at "resync" (/var/log/messages says that "raid array is not clean").

The problem is, the resync was blocking the /dev/md0. So, when I did a
'mount /dev/md0', it blocked until the resync was done (and it was a
looong time for a nearly 1TB RAID).

Looking through driver/md code I've realized that md_do_sync() was the
real devil. After a few diffs with 2.4.23 code I've realized that at the
speed limiter part of the function, the old "current->nice = " lines
were deleted.

After a few more search (and looking through LXR) at
/fs/jffs2/background.c and /net/bluetooth/bnep/core.c I've realized that
some people have changed "current->nice =" statements to
"set_user_nice(current,...)" ones.

Done that. The RAID worked just fine (still resyncing at boot, not fully
tested yet) but don't block mounts anymore (btw, mount returns a lot
faster than with 2.4.23).

Since I'm no kernel (nor RAID) expert (first post here, btw), just
wandering if I did something really stupid or not.

Also, is this an Alpha-only issue? Or a 2.6.0 issue?

Anyway, here follows the patch for what I've done.

thanks for the attention.

Fernando Serboncini



--- linux-2.6.0-test11/drivers/md/md.c  2003-11-26 18:43:29.000000000 -0200
+++ linux/drivers/md/md.c       2003-12-10 23:29:33.000000000 -0200
@@ -3290,6 +3290,8 @@
                 currspeed =
(j-mddev->resync_mark_cnt)/2/((jiffies-mddev->resync_mark)/HZ +1) +1;

                 if (currspeed > sysctl_speed_limit_min) {
+                       set_user_nice(current,19);
+
                         if ((currspeed > sysctl_speed_limit_max) ||
                                         !is_mddev_idle(mddev)) {
                                 current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
@@ -3297,6 +3299,8 @@
                                 goto repeat;
                         }
                 }
+               else
+                       set_user_nice(current,-20);
         }
         printk(KERN_INFO "md: md%d: sync done.\n",mdidx(mddev));
         /*




             reply	other threads:[~2003-12-12  0:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-12  0:25 Fernando Serboncini [this message]
2003-12-16 20:20 ` RAID5 resync blocking on 2.6.0-test11 Fernando Serboncini
2004-03-16 23:23   ` Neil Brown
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-11  1:48 Fernando Serboncini - Campo Geral

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FD90B15.8050905@campogeral.com.br \
    --to=fserb@campogeral.com.br \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.