Re: Linux/ACPI 2.4 release status and cpufreq

[Luca Capello <luca-wlebWZzHoyE@public.gmane.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

on 12/15/03 12:26, Micha Feigin wrote:
| The cvs version (iirc mentioned earlier in this thread, otherwise
| search the archives) applied cleanly to 2.4.23 last time I checked.
well, I just got an error applying the latest 'cpufreq' from
	http://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/cpufreq/

Here's the error (I used a fresh 2.4.23 with the latest ACPI patch):
| gismo:/usr/src/linux-2.4.23# bunzip2 -c
../kernel/cpufreq-LINUX_2_4-20031215.tar.bz2 | patch -p1
| missing header for unified diff at line 57 of patch
| patching file Documentation/00-INDEX
| patching file Documentation/Configure.help
| patching file Makefile
| patching file arch/i386/boot/setup.S
| patching file arch/i386/config.in
| patching file arch/i386/kernel/Makefile
| patching file arch/i386/kernel/i386_ksyms.c
| patching file arch/i386/kernel/setup.c
| patching file arch/i386/kernel/time.c
| patching file drivers/Makefile
| patching file include/asm-i386/ist.h
| patching file include/asm-i386/msr.h
| patching file include/asm-i386/smp.h
| patching file include/linux/smp.h
| patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line
| gismo:/usr/src/linux-2.4.23#

Thx, bye,
Gismo / Luca
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE/3Z42VAp7Xm10JmkRAjl6AJ956SUyP5EK5YxIntR9lLdaD3igDQCfYNsw
FH5MhlkTBT/le4358VeqbA4=
=azW0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
help you create better code?  SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/