Re: My first target module is a fiasco.

[Emmanuel Guiton <emmanuel@netlab.hut.fi>]

Hi,

KOVACS Krisztian wrote:

>
>   Could you show us the code of the init function, and the static 
> structure it registers? However, it looks like the kernel thinks your 
> module failed to load (its __init function did not return 0), however, 
> it has successfully registered its target... This is bad, since the 
> memory allocated for your module is freed when your __init function 
> returns any value other than zero.

Zero... Do you mean that "return 0;" at the end of my __init function is 
more appropriate than the current "return 1;"? :)
Well, I must admit that it works better like that... :) Thanks.

           Emmanuel