From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3FDE4126.4050508@tupshin.com> From: Tupshin Harper MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM and devfs References: <20031215194252.GA30671@percy.comedia.it> <20031215195720.84933.qmail@web13505.mail.yahoo.com> <20031215224841.GA7977@percy.comedia.it> In-Reply-To: <20031215224841.GA7977@percy.comedia.it> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Dec 15 17:19:02 2003 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com Luca Berra wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:57:20AM -0800, Stuart Felenstein wrote: > >> I think you may be off here. It was RedHat9 that gave me the option >> of using LVM. > > > i said _devfs_ is not supported, > _lvm_ is. > >> I've gone to the 2.4.23 kernel with devfs and lvm support. I know >> there is alot or a good amount of controvery around devfs but I think >> I'll ride it out and see how it works for me. >> > lvm1 tools do have a problem with switching from devfs to non-devfs, > and vice-versa since they use /proc/partitions to find pvs, and do write > the pv name in the metadata. (read the list archives for the gory > details) > > L. > > I have looked for this info, and haven't foud a conclusive answer. Is there a recipe (no matter how convoluted) for migrating from a devfs+lvm system to a non-devfs lvm system? -Tupshin