From: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>
To: jw schultz <jw@pegasys.ws>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: raid0 slower than devices it is assembled of?
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:51:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FDF1C03.2020509@aitel.hist.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031216040156.GJ12726@pegasys.ws>
jw schultz wrote:
> No Linux [R]AID improves sequential performance. How would
> reading 65KB from two disks in alternation be faster than
> reading continuously from one disk?
>
Raid-0 is ideally N times faster than a single disk, when
you have N disks. Because you can read continuously from N
disks instead of from 1, thereby N-doubling the bandwith.
Wether the current drivers manages that is of course another story.
Helge Hafting
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-16 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-15 13:34 raid0 slower than devices it is assembled of? Witold Krecicki
2003-12-15 15:44 ` Witold Krecicki
2003-12-16 4:01 ` jw schultz
2003-12-16 14:51 ` Helge Hafting [this message]
2003-12-16 16:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-16 20:58 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-16 21:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-17 10:53 ` Jörn Engel
2003-12-17 11:39 ` Peter Zaitsev
2003-12-17 16:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-17 18:37 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-17 21:55 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-17 17:02 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-17 20:14 ` Peter Zaitsev
2003-12-17 19:22 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-12-17 19:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-17 22:36 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-18 2:47 ` jw schultz
2003-12-17 22:29 ` bill davidsen
2003-12-18 2:18 ` jw schultz
2004-01-08 4:54 ` Greg Stark
2003-12-16 20:51 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-12-16 21:04 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-12-16 21:46 ` Witold Krecicki
2003-12-16 20:09 ` Witold Krecicki
2003-12-16 21:11 ` Adam Kropelin
2003-12-16 21:25 ` jw schultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FDF1C03.2020509@aitel.hist.no \
--to=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=jw@pegasys.ws \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.