All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Dee <antitux@antitux.net>
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
	Chris Meadors <clubneon@hereintown.net>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ??
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:02:56 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FE1F9E0.60102@antitux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031218184510.GD16315@mail.shareable.org>

see, that's the beauty of it. :)

Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> 
>>>The names could be chosen alphabetically.  Rooster was mentioned for
>>>2.7, but since 2.6 is beaver, I propose cock, as 'c' follows 'b'.
>>
>>Oh great. 
>>So now we've progressed from flamewars to cock fighting on LKML. 
> 
> 
> Are you two aware of which body parts are sometimes called
> "beaver" and "cock"?
> 
> -- Jamie
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-18 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-18 17:06 Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ?? Balram Adlakha
2003-12-18 11:44 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-12-18 11:49 ` Grahame White
2003-12-18 16:29   ` bill davidsen
2003-12-18 16:38 ` Chris Meadors
2003-12-18 17:33   ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-12-18 18:45     ` Jamie Lokier
2003-12-18 19:02       ` John Dee [this message]
2003-12-18 19:16       ` [SILLY] Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0' Maciej Soltysiak
2003-12-18 19:21   ` Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ?? Andrew Walrond
2003-12-18 19:37     ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-18 20:22       ` Andrew Walrond
2003-12-19  1:34   ` Maciej Zenczykowski
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-18  6:33 Can't wait for 2.8 or 3.0 Dan Brow
2003-12-18  6:30 ` Can't wait for '2.8 or 3.0',or maybe: 2.8 followed by 2.10 ?? Monchi Abbad
2003-12-18  7:34   ` Dan Brow
2003-12-18 10:58   ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2003-12-18 11:14     ` John Bradford
2003-12-18 12:46       ` Maciej Soltysiak
2003-12-18 16:26         ` bill davidsen
2003-12-18 21:03   ` Rob Landley
2003-12-19  0:32     ` Dan Brow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FE1F9E0.60102@antitux.net \
    --to=antitux@antitux.net \
    --cc=clubneon@hereintown.net \
    --cc=jamie@shareable.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.