All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bob <recbo@nishanet.com>
To: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: nforce2 one card per irq only
Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 06:41:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FE4357A.4040709@nishanet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031216225614.7824d575.khali@linux-fr.org>

Why does dmesg and dmesg -s65536 and
CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT 14 or 16 have
my dmesg and kern.log truncate here?
I can't see Ross' delay patch printk

In case of odd devfs vc tty thing I
tried "console=vc/0 console=tty0"

dmesg begins--

been registered
PnPBIOS: Scanning system for PnP BIOS support...
PnPBIOS: Found PnP BIOS installation structure at 0xc00fc660
PnPBIOS: PnP BIOS version 1.0, entry 0xf0000:0xc690, dseg 0xf0000
pnp: match found with the PnP device '00:07' and the driver 'system'
pnp: match found with the PnP device '00:08' and the driver 'system'
PnPBIOS: 13 nodes reported by PnP BIOS; 13 recorded by driver
SCSI subsystem initialized
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [APCS] enabled at IRQ 23
IOAPIC[0]: Set PCI routing entry (2-23 -> 0xa9 -> IRQ 23 Mode:1 Active:0)

and if I use smp instead of uniprocessor kernel,
I get a few lines more showing so Ross' numbers
show but PIC timer is on so the numbers are
useless

________________________________________________

MSI K7N2 Delta MCP2-T amd xp3000+ 333mhz fsb 1:1

nforce2, Award bios update stopped crashing

kernel 2.6.0-test11

I need Ross' ioapic patch to get ioapic edge timer
working.

cpu disconnect defaults to on, and on or off makes
no diff except 50% more MIS count, ERR 0 either way,
no crashes.

Once I moved a tulip ethernet 10/100 nic off the
irq of a promise ide controller I got ERR 0 and
much less MIS count.

24 hours uptime

           CPU0       
  0:   84527308    IO-APIC-edge  timer
  1:      37635    IO-APIC-edge  i8042
  2:          0          XT-PIC  cascade
  8:          1    IO-APIC-edge  rtc
  9:          0   IO-APIC-level  acpi
 12:     532175    IO-APIC-edge  i8042
 14:        106    IO-APIC-edge  ide0
 15:        215    IO-APIC-edge  ide1
 16:     354495   IO-APIC-level  ide2, ide3
 17:          0   IO-APIC-level  yenta, yenta
 19:     151532   IO-APIC-level  ide4, ide5
 20:     309690   IO-APIC-level  eth0
 21:       1579   IO-APIC-level  NVidia nForce2
NMI:          0 
LOC:   84527227 
ERR:          0
MIS:        188

according to athcool, cpu disconnect on

So one irq per slot is still necessary with pci on
this system, and hdparm unmask off did not help.

This is a uniprocessor but the hd controller and
tulip card on one irq would produce a lot of APIC
errors when cp over nfs while bonnie++, and here
is something from Maciej nominally for smp--

/usr/src/linux-2.6.0-test11/arch/i386/kernel/apic.c
        /*
         * Some unknown Intel IO/APIC (or APIC) errata is biting us with
         * certain networking cards. If high frequency interrupts are
         * happening on a particular IOAPIC pin, plus the IOAPIC routing
         * entry is masked/unmasked at a high rate as well then sooner or
         * later IOAPIC line gets 'stuck', no more interrupts are received
         * from the device. If focus CPU is disabled then the hang goes
         * away, oh well :-(
         *
         * [ This bug can be reproduced easily with a level-triggered
         *   PCI Ne2000 networking cards and PII/PIII processors, dual
         *   BX chipset. ]
         */
        /*
         * Actually disabling the focus CPU check just makes the hang less
         * frequent as it makes the interrupt distributon model be more
         * like LRU than MRU (the short-term load is more even across CPUs).
         * See also the comment in end_level_ioapic_irq().  --macro
         */



  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-20 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-16  3:52 [PATCH 2.6] sensors chip updates Mark M. Hoffman
2005-05-19  6:24 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2003-12-16  4:02 ` [PATCH 2.6] sensors chip updates (1 of 4) Mark M. Hoffman
2005-05-19  6:24   ` Mark M. Hoffman
2003-12-16  4:02 ` [PATCH 2.6] sensors chip updates (2 " Mark M. Hoffman
2005-05-19  6:24   ` Mark M. Hoffman
2003-12-16  4:03 ` [PATCH 2.6] sensors chip updates (3 " Mark M. Hoffman
2005-05-19  6:24   ` Mark M. Hoffman
2003-12-16  4:04 ` [PATCH 2.6] sensors chip updates (4 " Mark M. Hoffman
2005-05-19  6:24   ` Mark M. Hoffman
2003-12-16 21:56 ` [PATCH 2.6] sensors chip updates Jean Delvare
2005-05-19  6:24   ` Jean Delvare
2003-12-20 11:41   ` Bob [this message]
2003-12-18  0:04 ` Greg KH
2005-05-19  6:24   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FE4357A.4040709@nishanet.com \
    --to=recbo@nishanet.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.