From: Jean-Luc Fontaine <jfontain@free.fr>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: IDE performance drop between 2.4.23 and 2.6.0
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 13:42:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FE8382E.9040701@free.fr> (raw)
Using hdparm -Tt /dev/hdb:
on 2.4:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 168 MB in 2.01 seconds = 83.58 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 44 MB in 3.12 seconds = 14.10 MB/sec
on 2.6:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 172 MB in 2.02 seconds = 84.95 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 34 MB in 3.08 seconds = 11.04 MB/sec
Note the big drop of of 3 MB/sec on disk reads.
dmesg (edited) gives:
on 2.4:
VP_IDE: VIA vt82c586b (rev 41) IDE UDMA33 controller on pci00:07.1
hdb: IC35L040AVVN07-0, ATA DISK drive
hdb: 80418240 sectors (41174 MB) w/1863KiB Cache, CHS=79780/16/63,
UDMA(33)
on 2.6:
VP_IDE: VIA vt82c586b (rev 41) IDE UDMA33 controller on pci0000:00:07.1
hdb: IC35L040AVVN07-0, ATA DISK drive
hdb: 80418240 sectors (41174 MB) w/1863KiB Cache, CHS=65535/16/63,
UDMA(33)
hdparm -i output is identical between the 2 kernels and hdparm settings
are identical as follows (except cylinders as above):
Model=IC35L040AVVN07-0, FwRev=VA2OAG0A, SerialNo=VNP210B2RAP0TB
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=52
BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=1863kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=80418240
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 *udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
AdvancedPM=yes: disabled (255) WriteCache=enabled
Drive conforms to: ATA/ATAPI-5 T13 1321D revision 1:
multcount = 16 (on)
IO_support = 1 (32-bit)
unmaskirq = 1 (on)
using_dma = 1 (on)
keepsettings = 0 (off)
readonly = 0 (off)
readahead = 8 (on)
geometry = 79780/16/63, sectors = 80418240, start = 0
I noticed a difference in dmesg:
on 2.4:
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00beta4-2.4
on 2.6:
Uniform Multi-Platform E-IDE driver Revision: 7.00alpha2
Could that make a difference?
Please let me know if you'd like me to run more tests, patch kernels,
..., anything to regain the performance.
Many thanks in advance,
--
Jean-Luc Fontaine
next reply other threads:[~2003-12-23 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-23 12:42 Jean-Luc Fontaine [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-24 9:27 IDE performance drop between 2.4.23 and 2.6.0 Vid Strpic
2003-12-24 15:17 ` Gene Heskett
2003-12-24 17:24 ` Gordon Larsen
2003-12-25 5:20 Luis Miguel García
2003-12-25 13:56 Luis Miguel García
2003-12-25 14:35 ` Ed Sweetman
2003-12-25 20:35 ` Luis Miguel García
2003-12-25 16:39 Max Payne
2003-12-25 18:25 ` Jean-Luc Fontaine
2003-12-27 14:43 Jean-Luc Fontaine
2003-12-27 17:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-27 19:54 ` Jean-Luc Fontaine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FE8382E.9040701@free.fr \
--to=jfontain@free.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.