From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernard Pidoux F6BVP Subject: Re: [PATCH] ax25, netrom and rose fixes for 2.6.0 Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 23:10:15 +0100 Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <3FE8BD47.4010108@free.fr> References: <20031219234435.C211@jeroen.pe1rxq.ampr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20031219234435.C211@jeroen.pe1rxq.ampr.org> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org I just tried to compile FPAC 3.25 and FBB 7.04j against kernel 6.0 just to see how compilation would perform. Although I was sure there would be a number of obsolete code and that the programs will not run. I had to modify a few #includes. Replacing for example #include by "netax25/kernel_ax25.h" #include by "netax25/kernel_rose.h" #include by "netax25/kernel_netrom.h" helped the compilation. However in kernel_ax25.h I found that #define AX25_PIDINCL 8 that was in former ax25.h was no more defined. I guess this was removed on purpose ? Am I wrong ? 73 de Bernard, F6BVP ------------------------- Jeroen Vreeken wrote: > Hi, > > These are a few fixes for bugs I encountered over the last few weeks: > > - Fix some socket locking in ax25 > - Fix a waitqueue bug in ax25 > - Use sock_orphan in ax25 > - Fix a waitqueue bug in netrom > - Fix a waitqueue bug in rose > - Fix raw socket behaviour in ax25 > > Ralf, can you give your stamp of approval so Dave can apply them? > > Jeroen