Re: handling an oddball PS/2 keyboard

[David Monro <davidm@amberdata.demon.co.uk>]

John Bradford wrote:
>>I suppose Vojtech will have no objections to using this ID
>>to skip the tests for e0 and e1 as protocol (escape) scancodes.
> 
> 
> There might be no need for such a workaround - a lot of PS/2 devices
> which were not intended for PCs work fine in set 3, particularly if
> the device they were intended to work with uses set 3 natively, where
> this conflict with protocol scancodes problem doesn't exist.  If the
> keyboard works in set 3, add 0xab85 to the list of keyboards to force
> set 3 for, (and maybe also add the ID for my keyboard while we're at
> it :-) ).

I will definitely explore this possibility. Whats the ID of your 
keyboard? (and what is it?)

Cheers,

	David

> 
> John.