All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Samuel Flory <sflory@rackable.com>
To: Johannes Ruscheinski <ruschein@mail-infomine.ucr.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Best Low-cost IDE RAID Solution For 2.6.x? (OT?)
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 18:10:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FEF8CFD.7060502@rackable.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031228180424.GA16622@mail-infomine.ucr.edu>

Johannes Ruscheinski wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> We're looking for a low-cost high-reliability IDE RAID solution that works well
> with the 2.6.x series of kernels.  We have about 1 TB (8 disks) that we'd
> like to access in a non-redundant raid mode.  Yes, I know, that lack of
> redundancy and high reliability are contradictory.  Let's just say that
> currently we lack the funding to do anything else but we may be able to obtain
> more funding for our disk storage needs in the near future.


   It really depends on what you mean by low cost?  The ony ide raid 
controller that does 8 PATA drives well under linux is the 3ware 
controller.  For SATA drives you have the 3ware, and adaptec controller. 
    In theroy the highpoint 8 port sata card would be a good canidate 
for software raid, but highpoint has yet to cough up an open source 
drive yet.

   It you want to go the software raid route and have 2 spare pci solts. 
  You can go with either the high point rocket raid 454 (PATA), or the 
promise SATA150 TX4.

   I really don't recommend any of promise's cards that use use the i2o 
driver, or any sort of binary only driver.

PS- Why not at least run software raid 5?  It takes far less cpu than 
you'd think, and can save your ass.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-12-29  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-12-28 18:04 Best Low-cost IDE RAID Solution For 2.6.x? (OT?) Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-28 18:50 ` Joel Jaeggli
2003-12-28 21:35   ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-28 21:45     ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-12-28 22:14       ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-28 23:05       ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-12-29  1:18         ` Wakko Warner
2003-12-28 21:56     ` bert hubert
2003-12-28 23:36     ` Joel Jaeggli
2004-01-07 23:28       ` bill davidsen
2003-12-29  2:10 ` Samuel Flory [this message]
2003-12-29 13:41   ` Tomas Szepe
2003-12-29 18:59     ` Johannes Ruscheinski
2003-12-29 19:04       ` Samuel Flory
2003-12-29 19:06         ` Tomas Szepe
2003-12-30  0:03         ` Wakko Warner
2003-12-30  6:54           ` Tomas Szepe
2003-12-30 14:41             ` Wakko Warner
2003-12-30 20:58               ` Samuel Flory
2004-01-07 23:35               ` bill davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3FEF8CFD.7060502@rackable.com \
    --to=sflory@rackable.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ruschein@mail-infomine.ucr.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.