From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Daniel Brahneborg <daniel.com@wtnord.net>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Status of Promise drivers?
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 14:06:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FF1CCC1.3050304@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031230200012.C14399@nettis.grimsta>
Daniel Brahneborg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having serious problems with my Silicon Image SATA card,
> and am considering replacing with a (more expensive) Promise
> SATA TX2 Plus card.
>
> First I have some questions, to avoid getting into the same
> mess as I'm in now.
>
> 1. What is the status of the Promise driver? Stable for
> everybody? (The SI3112 has problems for some people when
> using the IDE driver, and for some with the SCSI driver.)
> A binary module is ok, a binary bzImage definately is not.
It's beta, and stable.
> 2. Has anybody used the driver on an Abit KV7 motherboard?
>
> 3. Has anybody used it with *2* network cards? Bonus
> points for the builtin Via Rhine and an 8139 card.
> (The SCSI driver for the SI3112 kills the machine when a
> second card is activated.)
>
> 4. Has anybody used it together with two other disks on the
> VIA SATA interface on the KV7?
>
> 5. Has anybody used it for a Raid5 setup? (With SI3112 Raid1
> works better than Raid5, since Raid5 gives corrupted files
> all over the place and Raid1 only corrupts them once in
> a while.)
Any comparison with Silicon Image is false. The Silicon Image driver
has been repeatedly stated (by me, the author) to be BROKEN. It is
thusly marked with CONFIG_BROKEN.
Those who ignore the author stating the Silicon Image driver is _alpha_
and unfinished do so at their own risk.
> 6. Has anybody used it in a non-root setup, having hda on
> the PATA interface? (The SI3112 causes lots of problems
> with I/O port and IRQ conflicts, requiring hours of
> tweaking of the boot parameters.)
PATA interfaces on Promise SATA are not yet supported.
> 7. Do you have DMA enabled? (SI3112 without DMA works fine,
> but with terrible performance.)
DMA cannot be disabled :)
> 8. Do you get decent performance? (The 5MB/sec I get without
> DMA on the SI3112 card is _not_ decent.)
Performance is far beyond this.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-30 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-30 19:00 Status of Promise drivers? Daniel Brahneborg
2003-12-30 19:06 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2003-12-30 19:24 ` Daniel Brahneborg
2003-12-30 19:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-30 20:18 ` Daniel Brahneborg
2003-12-30 20:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-30 20:38 ` Daniel Brahneborg
2003-12-30 23:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-01-10 15:14 ` Daniel Brahneborg
2003-12-30 20:21 ` Hendrik Visage
2003-12-30 20:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-02-03 18:23 ` Daniel Brahneborg
2004-02-04 15:02 ` Gunnlaugur Thor Briem
2004-02-06 21:13 ` Gunnlaugur Thor Briem
2003-12-30 23:21 ` Status of HighPoint / " Daniel Brahneborg
2003-12-30 23:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-12-30 23:55 ` jlewis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FF1CCC1.3050304@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=daniel.com@wtnord.net \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.