From: Mircea Ciocan <mirceac@interplus.ro>
To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Please help with a special RAID 1 setup
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 12:16:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FFBDC7A.8020702@interplus.ro> (raw)
Hello all,
First excuse me for a looong message, but I've tryed to give as much
relevant details as possible.
Please help me with this weird setup if it is possible and fesable:
I have this raid1 device, composed of two fibre channel devices
mounted in RAID1, it works absolutely flawlessly.
The resulted device is used for a lot of important data logging and the
ideea is to hotattach a 3-rd device ot the same size, wait for
syncronisation and after all of them are syncronised, stop the data
logging process, wait for a while, issue a sync command and hot detach
the 3-rd device restart de data logging and walk away with valid
filesytem backup of the main arry to be used as separate data analysys
source. I know that solution is somewhat cumberome but trust me this is
needed as is.
Now if you read untill here I managed to hot-attach, the attaching
was mentioned in the syslogfile, the data logging process continued
undisturbed, even the cat /proc/mdstat showed the new device added BUT
it only showed the same two [2/2] [UU] and it didn't touch the 3-rd
disk at all, also hotremoving was sucessful.
Here are some relevant data of the test setup that may be usefull:
[root@test]# cat /etc/raidtab
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level 1
nr-raid-disks 2
nr-spare-disks 0
chunk-size 4
persistent-superblock 1
device /dev/sda2
raid-disk 0
device /dev/sdb2
raid-disk 1
/proc/mdstat BEFORE adding the 3-rd device:
[root@test]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
read_ahead 1024 sectors
md0 : active raid1 scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part2[1]
scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0/part2[0]
710938560 blocks [2/2] [UU]
unused devices: <none>
Then I add the 3-rd device:
[root@test]# raidhotadd /dev/md0 /dev/sdb3
/proc/mdstat AFTER adding 3-rd device
[root@nfs10 root]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
read_ahead 1024 sectors
md0 : active raid1 scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part3[2]
scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part2[1] scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0/part2[0]
710938560 blocks [2/2] [UU]
unused devices: <none>
Piece of the syslog showing the add results:
.....
Jan 7 12:09:01 nfs10 kernel: md: updating md0 RAID superblock on device
Jan 7 12:09:01 nfs10 kernel: md: scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part3
[events: 00000012]<6>(write) scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part3's sb
offset: 725598144
Jan 7 12:09:01 nfs10 kernel: md: scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part2
[events: 00000012]<6>(write) scsi/host3/bus0/target0/lun0/part2's sb
offset: 710938560
Jan 7 12:09:01 nfs10 kernel: md: scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0/part2
[events: 00000012]<6>(write) scsi/host2/bus0/target0/lun0/part2's sb
offset: 710938560
......
The problem is that no sync is done, as a matter of fact the 3rd
disk is not even scrached visibly ;(, did I miss someting obvious or
what I want is impossible ???
Thank you for reading such a long mail and for any help that will
lead me solving this,
Mircea Ciocan
next reply other threads:[~2004-01-07 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-07 10:16 Mircea Ciocan [this message]
2004-01-07 12:20 ` Please help with a special RAID 1 setup Catalin BOIE
2004-01-07 13:23 ` Mircea Ciocan
2004-01-07 13:31 ` Catalin BOIE
2004-01-07 13:47 ` Catalin BOIE
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-07 14:48 Cress, Andrew R
2004-01-07 15:33 ` Mircea Ciocan
2004-01-07 16:09 ` Luca Berra
2004-01-07 15:32 Dr. Greg Wettstein
2004-01-07 18:14 Rechenberg, Andrew
2004-01-07 18:59 ` Michael
2004-01-07 20:17 ` Mircea Ciocan
2004-01-07 19:28 Cress, Andrew R
2004-01-07 20:21 ` Mircea Ciocan
2004-01-13 20:50 linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FFBDC7A.8020702@interplus.ro \
--to=mirceac@interplus.ro \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.