Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: add sock_ops callbacks for data send/recv/acked events

[Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>]

On 11/23/23 4:37 AM, Philo Lu wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot to cc the maintainers.
> 
> On 2023/11/23 11:07, Philo Lu wrote:
>> Add 3 sock_ops operators, namely BPF_SOCK_OPS_DATA_SEND_CB,
>> BPF_SOCK_OPS_DATA_RECV_CB, and BPF_SOCK_OPS_DATA_ACKED_CB. A flag
>> BPF_SOCK_OPS_DATA_EVENT_CB_FLAG is provided to minimize the performance
>> impact. The flag must be explicitly set to enable these callbacks.
>>
>> If the flag is enabled, bpf sock_ops program will be called every time a
>> tcp data packet is sent, received, and acked.
>> BPF_SOCK_OPS_DATA_SEND_CB: call bpf after a data packet is sent.
>> BPF_SOCK_OPS_DATA_RECV_CB: call bpf after a data packet is receviced.
>> BPF_SOCK_OPS_DATA_ACKED_CB: call bpf after a valid ack packet is
>> processed (some sent data are ackknowledged).
>>
>> We use these callbacks for fine-grained tcp monitoring, which collects
>> and analyses every tcp request/response event information. The whole
>> system has been described in SIGMOD'18 (see
>> https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3183713.3190659 for details). To
>> achieve this with bpf, we require hooks for data events that call
>> sock_ops bpf (1) when any data packet is sent/received/acked, and (2)
>> after critical tcp state variables have been updated (e.g., snd_una,
>> snd_nxt, rcv_nxt). However, existing sock_ops operators cannot meet our
>> requirements.
>>
>> Besides, these hooks also help to debug tcp when data send/recv/acked.

This all sounds like a tracing use case. Why tracepoint is not used instead?