From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC7BC433F5 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:27:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E2960F56 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:27:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238066AbhJ0OaU (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:30:20 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:35983 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238198AbhJ0OaT (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:30:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1635344873; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KHHrb1tiDY2STHq9SuLRvZy3hZaADD9wEfu9gCQmDxI=; b=F1yT8CIW2rq/fVl+KFaD/j+sXSSPu0hspZcE6p3ogxwQSStFbbnkI15iIjwUQw0VPDr67C 6vajQ6Fzs4h8JpCeck2rrbyijUup3JJ2xzZ4BqOq/ZrVtrQFdoAxjJI1DK5ohmR67P821/ mx88wiHScmwUUyb8LXp9SkwLu/bPO9w= Received: from mail-ed1-f72.google.com (mail-ed1-f72.google.com [209.85.208.72]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-510-9dqKB_naOqqSitzR_1xraQ-1; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:27:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 9dqKB_naOqqSitzR_1xraQ-1 Received: by mail-ed1-f72.google.com with SMTP id f21-20020a0564021e9500b003dd77985601so2483977edf.9 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 07:27:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KHHrb1tiDY2STHq9SuLRvZy3hZaADD9wEfu9gCQmDxI=; b=aMlwgkxqXuwmB5f859d8FrjKJiPf50feCmMfDymxwJM909ZHVSKij44X1Jhqp8rk0S Buc7MfAJllvZVeuMdH7id6Uo9XtjxNN1FT4piUzAJYX5jOHe+m5jO1mGTlHKQxfYg4kw 60KqpMLImZH0MozAGynlx2NNl91H+U4cLxFNJWSRYxRG6k5N6Wwj8gWqmO8XAzzmDap2 d8MTNA4A1CiTDy9QrQkoFYvcIQOsCqGjcPT/Wg0uBc50juVFSqXTynFI1IvQ8VBFNcoO zAS/T61dON6yPImK0GaHjRL2Py2qQzFlL+DIPjZ1i/curcQcype7ESlgr/A3Wwi6npHq KqWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5329JR+jkjEorvVx/Pk90eqM5UmR4kr5E3nEG6aZtAa4iLBF6qU6 ZWi2DWFZnQcgqc/dVJZXSOpbz8vLi3JtdClvZhcgHwUEasgsHZoM6nJfincHVzZcAE7hmwjTiO6 IuehfQyHm5X55XkfiamBhBQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:961a:: with SMTP id gb26mr17802488ejc.527.1635344871503; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 07:27:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw7TA88/kBuw1NJY7C8S9WnDH4N9C07D2dZ27TMGAfrekL2kIaYn912rjHXCE9gQ/3xdFOx4A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:961a:: with SMTP id gb26mr17802469ejc.527.1635344871372; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 07:27:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:1c00:c1e:bf00:1054:9d19:e0f0:8214? (2001-1c00-0c1e-bf00-1054-9d19-e0f0-8214.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl. [2001:1c00:c1e:bf00:1054:9d19:e0f0:8214]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q23sm47512ejr.0.2021.10.27.07.27.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 07:27:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3ad75583-b37e-8700-d062-42426966d912@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:27:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] ACPI: scan: Honor certain device identification rules Content-Language: en-US To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux ACPI Cc: Andy Shevchenko , LKML , Mika Westerberg References: <11860508.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher> From: Hans de Goede In-Reply-To: <11860508.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 10/26/21 20:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi All, > > There are some rules in the ACPI spec regarding which device identification > objects can be used together etc., but they are not followed by the kernel > code. > > This series modifies the code to follow the spec more closely (see patch > changelogs for details). Both changes seem sensible to me; and since you make _HID take precedence over _ADR I don't expect this to cause any regressions on BYT / CHT hardware (the other way around will likely be an issue). So for the series: Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede Regards, Hans