From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26D1C433E0 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DFED20773 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="WbcXrOON" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7DFED20773 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:48780 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlYyX-0001ua-LN for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:23:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlYx0-0008Q8-RL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:22:02 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:44373 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jlYwy-0005DO-LZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:22:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1592403719; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=p2Pr/BUhfiqFU0Cbr2z7m0fWri+RS+yBbbCeKb/88C0=; b=WbcXrOON+YQbaPhuQ1GbFV3wk68KfN83gI4ltefXUw0pRROoX7M9+GlMkh4lzKHwHKVZ3s RkGhLXDfwgg0m/S+4uKivAyn5NE/Lj9JsA5Xxxh6f0JmJOSzaYX2oPvTi1Y+Wk7v8BlX50 gD5BTZRw/qel1z1V2oteNPRGPwKeY5A= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-310-71QWI4b3PAGWAGAOt4DfGw-1; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:21:57 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 71QWI4b3PAGWAGAOt4DfGw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A603E931; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:21:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dresden.str.redhat.com (ovpn-113-111.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.111]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 188DF5D9D3; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:21:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] iotests: Some fixes for rarely run cases To: Kevin Wolf References: <20200617104822.27525-1-mreitz@redhat.com> <20200617125238.GC5166@linux.fritz.box> <20200617141922.GE5166@linux.fritz.box> From: Max Reitz Autocrypt: addr=mreitz@redhat.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQENBFXOJlcBCADEyyhOTsoa/2ujoTRAJj4MKA21dkxxELVj3cuILpLTmtachWj7QW+TVG8U /PsMCFbpwsQR7oEy8eHHZwuGQsNpEtNC2G/L8Yka0BIBzv7dEgrPzIu+W3anZXQW4702+uES U29G8TP/NGfXRRHGlbBIH9KNUnOSUD2vRtpOLXkWsV5CN6vQFYgQfFvmp5ZpPeUe6xNplu8V mcTw8OSEDW/ZnxJc8TekCKZSpdzYoxfzjm7xGmZqB18VFwgJZlIibt1HE0EB4w5GsD7x5ekh awIe3RwoZgZDLQMdOitJ1tUc8aqaxvgA4tz6J6st8D8pS//m1gAoYJWGwwIVj1DjTYLtABEB AAG0HU1heCBSZWl0eiA8bXJlaXR6QHJlZGhhdC5jb20+iQFTBBMBCAA9AhsDBQkSzAMABQsJ CAcCBhUICQoLAgQWAgMBAh4BAheABQJVzie5FRhoa3A6Ly9rZXlzLmdudXBnLm5ldAAKCRD0 B9sAYdXPQDcIB/9uNkbYEex1rHKz3mr12uxYMwLOOFY9fstP5aoVJQ1nWQVB6m2cfKGdcRe1 2/nFaHSNAzT0NnKz2MjhZVmcrpyd2Gp2QyISCfb1FbT82GMtXFj1wiHmPb3CixYmWGQUUh+I AvUqsevLA+WihgBUyaJq/vuDVM1/K9Un+w+Tz5vpeMidlIsTYhcsMhn0L9wlCjoucljvbDy/ 8C9L2DUdgi3XTa0ORKeflUhdL4gucWoAMrKX2nmPjBMKLgU7WLBc8AtV+84b9OWFML6NEyo4 4cP7cM/07VlJK53pqNg5cHtnWwjHcbpGkQvx6RUx6F1My3y52vM24rNUA3+ligVEgPYBuQEN BFXOJlcBCADAmcVUNTWT6yLWQHvxZ0o47KCP8OcLqD+67T0RCe6d0LP8GsWtrJdeDIQk+T+F xO7DolQPS6iQ6Ak2/lJaPX8L0BkEAiMuLCKFU6Bn3lFOkrQeKp3u05wCSV1iKnhg0UPji9V2 W5eNfy8F4ZQHpeGUGy+liGXlxqkeRVhLyevUqfU0WgNqAJpfhHSGpBgihUupmyUg7lfUPeRM DzAN1pIqoFuxnN+BRHdAecpsLcbR8sQddXmDg9BpSKozO/JyBmaS1RlquI8HERQoe6EynJhd 64aICHDfj61rp+/0jTIcevxIIAzW70IadoS/y3DVIkuhncgDBvGbF3aBtjrJVP+5ABEBAAGJ ASUEGAEIAA8FAlXOJlcCGwwFCRLMAwAACgkQ9AfbAGHVz0CbFwf9F/PXxQR9i4N0iipISYjU sxVdjJOM2TMut+ZZcQ6NSMvhZ0ogQxJ+iEQ5OjnIputKvPVd5U7WRh+4lF1lB/NQGrGZQ1ic alkj6ocscQyFwfib+xIe9w8TG1CVGkII7+TbS5pXHRxZH1niaRpoi/hYtgzkuOPp35jJyqT/ /ELbqQTDAWcqtJhzxKLE/ugcOMK520dJDeb6x2xVES+S5LXby0D4juZlvUj+1fwZu+7Io5+B bkhSVPb/QdOVTpnz7zWNyNw+OONo1aBUKkhq2UIByYXgORPFnbfMY7QWHcjpBVw9MgC4tGeF R4bv+1nAMMxKmb5VvQCExr0eFhJUAHAhVg== Message-ID: <3afedc33-7e6a-73cd-e70d-e353abd574ed@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:21:53 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200617141922.GE5166@linux.fritz.box> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qJP0DX8FGuEfEEluCfXXxxjk1HU6IodQY" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.61; envelope-from=mreitz@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/17 02:02:46 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --qJP0DX8FGuEfEEluCfXXxxjk1HU6IodQY Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="dLktbsDyZWABJbTQ7lshabNVJYnURcUZR" --dLktbsDyZWABJbTQ7lshabNVJYnURcUZR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 17.06.20 16:19, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 17.06.2020 um 16:11 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: >> On 17.06.20 14:52, Kevin Wolf wrote: >>> Am 17.06.2020 um 12:48 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Thomas=E2=80=99s report >>>> (https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2020-06/msg00791.htm= l) >>>> has given me a nice excuse to write this series. >>>> >>>> There are some iotests that have recently start to fail in rarely >>>> exercised test environments (qed, qcow2 with data_file, qcow2 v2), and >>>> this series fixes what I found. >>> >>> Thanks, applied to the block branch. >> >> Sorry, I didn=E2=80=99t run iotest 297 before sending this series... >> >> The problems arise in patch 1: >> >> iotests.py:1113:0: C0301: Line too long (80/79) (line-too-long) >> iotests.py:1106: error: Function is missing a return type annotation >> >> (So there=E2=80=99s a line with 80 characters, when 79 is the maximum (*= shrug*), >> and I failed to specify skip_for_format=E2=80=99s return type.) >> >> I think patch 1 needs the attached diff squashed in. Are you willing to >> do that or should I just send a v2? >=20 > I'm squashing it in. In fact, I already had fixed it, but I was too lazy > to be more specific than Callable[..., Any], so I'll replace that with > your version. I have to admit I was intrigued to see how the actual signature would turn out, so I followed it through until the biter end. :) Thanks! --dLktbsDyZWABJbTQ7lshabNVJYnURcUZR-- --qJP0DX8FGuEfEEluCfXXxxjk1HU6IodQY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEkb62CjDbPohX0Rgp9AfbAGHVz0AFAl7qJwEACgkQ9AfbAGHV z0A8mwf8DQPGOObiwhc2wSQI5V1gGnHN8a7cW3qlOa3fIDOPPGqi10WxwH1hiXCU paPTtE5VVapVc0fDniEKPYdEzPX/vQFqmxkX13qPl+K9r8NkQXxIQJjkgMD5Cj4p Z7ZEXX6xyZevcpckayLpOpyMm5yccd9Gf6D6mx2NTh+zGMd+cRhk2wCpYsEEGKwR orxxIHNllbltsSnsNB1AuxA86hOc74qc08B0CTStP6xkWXU4EmgtnrWC0YDQ+E0/ gNZ4rP/+mon94Zvj73s1wffKE5JhY0ReGLRPcyu/TNIE/qP3EJz/npz51vljUPnM ZlTKqpO13VbcTxXyf7ZOYmfCjIthuQ== =b347 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qJP0DX8FGuEfEEluCfXXxxjk1HU6IodQY--