From: Kero-Chan <kerochan2@gmail.com>
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Grzegorz Milos <gm281@hermes.cam.ac.uk>, xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: calling vif-script
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:12:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3b793f1a050118171242d5ce53@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Cr1uN-0003Sr-00@mta1.cl.cam.ac.uk>
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 22:33:06 +0000, Keir Fraser
<Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> > Hi there!
> >
> > I am just writing some documents on vif setup (network and vif setup scripts)
> > and I noticed that xend does not supply ip parameter (and therefore vif-route
> > script is so dumb). You might already know about the issue.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Gregor
>
> It supplies the ip parameter if you specify it as part of the 'vif'
> configuration in your config file. It's another sub-option, like
> specifying the MAC address.
>
> -- Keir
vif-route does not currently work. It's OK for a single domU, but if I
start more domains, all the vifs get the same IP! Each vif would need
a separate IP for routing to work.
vif-route doesn't set up the route either.
So what would be a good scheme? 169.254.X.Y for vifX.Y?
A domain may get different vifs at different times, and a different IP
for the vif would interfere with using NFS root from dom0 (nfs_server
would be always different).
What about a vif_ip or similar option in the domain configuration file?
--
/Varga Péter/
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-19 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-22 14:05 memory and cpu usage Flavio Leitner
2004-11-23 17:42 ` Rik van Riel
2004-11-23 16:04 ` Flavio Leitner
2004-11-23 18:10 ` Mike Wray
2005-01-18 19:14 ` calling vif-script Grzegorz Milos
2005-01-18 22:33 ` Keir Fraser
2005-01-19 1:12 ` Kero-Chan [this message]
2005-01-19 2:11 ` Kero-Chan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-18 22:30 Ian Pratt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3b793f1a050118171242d5ce53@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kerochan2@gmail.com \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=gm281@hermes.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.