From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kero-Chan Subject: Re: calling vif-script Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 03:11:42 +0100 Message-ID: <3b793f1a05011818114d8a4f7e@mail.gmail.com> References: <200501181914.17382.gm281@hermes.cam.ac.uk> <3b793f1a050118171242d5ce53@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Kero-Chan Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3b793f1a050118171242d5ce53@mail.gmail.com> Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 02:12:18 +0100, Kero-Chan wrote: > vif-route does not currently work. It's OK for a single domU, but if I > start more domains, all the vifs get the same IP! Each vif would need > a separate IP for routing to work. > vif-route doesn't set up the route either. > So what would be a good scheme? 169.254.X.Y for vifX.Y? > A domain may get different vifs at different times, and a different IP > for the vif would interfere with using NFS root from dom0 (nfs_server > would be always different). > What about a vif_ip or similar option in the domain configuration file? OK sorry. I realised my previous post is plain wrong. --=20 /Varga P=E9ter/ ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt