Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix build bug with binutils < 2.18 and GCC < 4.2

[Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>]

[putting linuxppc-dev on Cc:, hope you don't mind]

On 24 jul 2008, at 08:32, Chuck Meade wrote:

>>> I wanted to reply to your original message regarding this, but sadly 
>>> I
>>> had
>>> already deleted it.  So I am sending directly to you.
>>>
>>> This patch broke my link.
>>
>> Sorry.  I didn't test with anything _that_ ancient.
>>
>>> Reverting it, I am again able to link the latest
>>> git fetch of the kernel, but with your patch, my ld breaks.
>>>
>>> I am using binutils 2.15, successfully until this patch was applied
>>> yesterday.
>>
>> What target / what config / what exact GCC version / what
>> exact binutils version / why are you using such an ancient
>> toolchain anyway?  :-)

> I have been using gcc 3.4.4 and binutils 2.15 up to this point without
> problems.  Yes they are not cutting-edge by any means,

Updating to GCC 3.4.6 might be a good idea, it's the latest bug fix
release in the 3.4 series.  I agree PowerPC Linux should still be
buildable with GCC 3.4; I don't think we really care about 3.3 or
older anymore though.

> but the concern
> here is that this patch causes the linker to fail for the first time.
> Up until now the link has worked fine, and if I revert this patch, the
> link continues to work well.

Yeah, I understand.  I'm not saying you need to upgrade your toolchain
(or, I'm not yet saying that anyway; will have to see what causes this
problem first); I just said I neglected to test with anything that old.

> For one of my customers, we use a customized build system that can 
> share
> cross toolsets for builds of multiple platforms.  So the fact that
> these tools have worked for us cross several 83xx platforms for a long
> time is valuable.  It would be highly desirable to have the linker
> continue to work.

Sure, I'll try my best to find out what is wrong, and fix it for you
if possible.

> I am very willing to work with you and test the alternative patch ideas
> you have for vmlinux.lds.S on my tools here.  This patch was in the
> general interest of backwards-compatibility with pre-2.18 binutils 
> anyway.

Yes, exactly: 2.6.26 does not build with binutils 2.17.

> I can help you by testing on 2.15.  Send me alternate vmlinux.lds.S 
> files
> to try, and I will test and get back to you ASAP.

No, I will not send you randomly changed source files and hope they
will do something useful for you.  Instead, why not provide me the
information I asked for?  What target (arch/powerpc it sounds like?)
What _exact_ binutils version (FSF 2.15?)  What _exact_ GCC version
(FSF 3.4.4?)  What Linux config (either the full .config, or the
name of a defconfig)?

> The link error, in case you were wondering, was:

Yes, I forgot to ask for that :-)

> powerpc-8325-linux-gnu-ld: final link failed: File truncated

What was the command line here?  Was it the linking of vmlinux?


Segher