From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>,
broonie@kernel.org, cezary.rojewski@intel.com,
liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com, yang.jie@linux.intel.com,
perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: atom: Remove redundant check to simplify the code
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 10:22:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ca07ce3-6d5c-20cc-8992-4700490ea472@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211125075028.8500-1-tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
On 11/25/21 1:50 AM, Tang Bin wrote:
> In the function sst_platform_get_resources(), if platform_get_irq()
> failed, the return should not be zero, as the example in
> platform.c is
> * int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0)
> * if (irq < 0)
> * return irq;
> So remove the redundant check to simplify the code.
Humm, it's a bit of a gray area.
the comments for platform_get_irq and platform_get_irq_optional say:
* Return: non-zero IRQ number on success, negative error number on failure.
but if you look at platform_get_irq_optional, there are two references
to zero being a possible return value:
if (num == 0 && has_acpi_companion(&dev->dev)) {
ret = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev), num);
/* Our callers expect -ENXIO for missing IRQs. */
if (ret >= 0 || ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
goto out;
out_not_found:
ret = -ENXIO;
out:
WARN(ret == 0, "0 is an invalid IRQ number\n");
return ret;
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/base/platform.c#L234
I am not sure if there's any merit in removing the test for the zero
return value. It may be on the paranoid side but it's aligned with a
possible code path in the platform code.
Or it could be that the platform code is wrong, and the label used
should have been
/* Our callers expect -ENXIO for missing IRQs. */
if (ret >= 0 || ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
goto out_not_found;
Adding Andy Shevchenko for advice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c
> index 3be64430c..696d547c5 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c
> @@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ static int sst_platform_get_resources(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx)
> /* Find the IRQ */
> ctx->irq_num = platform_get_irq(pdev,
> ctx->pdata->res_info->acpi_ipc_irq_index);
> - if (ctx->irq_num <= 0)
> - return ctx->irq_num < 0 ? ctx->irq_num : -EIO;
> + if (ctx->irq_num < 0)
> + return ctx->irq_num;
>
> return 0;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-29 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-25 7:50 [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: atom: Remove redundant check to simplify the code Tang Bin
2021-11-29 16:22 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2021-11-29 17:11 ` Mark Brown
2021-11-29 19:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-29 19:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-29 19:08 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 18:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-30 9:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ca07ce3-6d5c-20cc-8992-4700490ea472@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=yang.jie@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.