RE: [PATCH rtw-next] wifi: rtw88: extend the TX report timeout to RTL8822BU

[Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>]

Hi Josef,

Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22/09/2026 05:03, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
> > Josef Schlehofer <pepe.schlehofer@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c
> >> index 4e110a457..55d7923e1 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/tx.c
> >> @@ -208,7 +208,8 @@ void rtw_tx_report_enqueue(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, struct sk_buff *skb, u8 sn)
> >>         __skb_queue_tail(&tx_report->queue, skb);
> >>         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx_report->q_lock, flags);
> >>
> >> -       if ((rtwdev->chip->id == RTW_CHIP_TYPE_8723D &&
> >> +       if (((rtwdev->chip->id == RTW_CHIP_TYPE_8723D ||
> >> +             rtwdev->chip->id == RTW_CHIP_TYPE_8822B) &&
> >>              rtwdev->hci.type == RTW_HCI_TYPE_USB) ||
> >
> > Hi Bitterblue,
> >
> > It seems like more and more USB chips need this, let's enlarge timeout time
> > for all USB devices. Do you have any concern? Need your input.
> >
> 
> It seems fine to me.
> 
> >>             rtw_is_8723bs(rtwdev))
> >
> > Also, considering SDIO chips, should we keep original timeout for PCI only?
> >
> 
> This too.
> 

I sent a patch [1]. Please test if it works to you. 
If so, I'd take my one, and drop this.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20260924004637.9958-1-pkshih@realtek.com/T/#u