All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Moger, Babu" <bmoger@amd.com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
	Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>,
	corbet@lwn.net, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	thuth@redhat.com, paulmck@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, xiongwei.song@windriver.com,
	pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com,
	daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com, perry.yuan@amd.com,
	sandipan.das@amd.com, kai.huang@intel.com, xiaoyao.li@intel.com,
	seanjc@google.com, jithu.joseph@intel.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com,
	xin3.li@intel.com, ebiggers@google.com,
	andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, mario.limonciello@amd.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com,
	tony.luck@intel.com, vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	peternewman@google.com, maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com,
	eranian@google.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 20/26] x86/resctrl: Auto assign/unassign counters when mbm_cntr_assign is enabled
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 18:22:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3d32c528-24fb-e701-a70b-331d1a04493a@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79b8049a-b213-4d86-a021-cfd9f7389f5b@intel.com>

Hi Reinette,

On 11/18/2024 11:18 AM, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
> 
> On 10/29/24 4:21 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> Assign/unassign counters on resctrl group creation/deletion. Two counters
>> are required per group, one for MBM total event and one for MBM local
>> event.
>>
>> There are a limited number of counters available for assignment. If these
>> counters are exhausted, the kernel will display the error message: "Out of
>> MBM assignable counters". However, it is not necessary to fail the
>> creation of a group due to assignment failures. Users have the flexibility
>> to modify the assignments at a later time.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@amd.com>
>> ---
>> v9: Changed rdtgroup_assign_cntrs() and rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs() to return void.
>>      Updated couple of rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs() calls properly.
>>      Updated function comments.
>>
>> v8: Renamed rdtgroup_assign_grp to rdtgroup_assign_cntrs.
>>      Renamed rdtgroup_unassign_grp to rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs.
>>      Fixed the problem with unassigning the child MON groups of CTRL_MON group.
>>
>> v7: Reworded the commit message.
>>      Removed the reference of ABMC with mbm_cntr_assign.
>>      Renamed the function rdtgroup_assign_cntrs to rdtgroup_assign_grp.
>>
>> v6: Removed the redundant comments on all the calls of
>>      rdtgroup_assign_cntrs. Updated the commit message.
>>      Dropped printing error message on every call of rdtgroup_assign_cntrs.
>>
>> v5: Removed the code to enable/disable ABMC during the mount.
>>      That will be another patch.
>>      Added arch callers to get the arch specific data.
>>      Renamed fuctions to match the other abmc function.
>>      Added code comments for assignment failures.
>>
>> v4: Few name changes based on the upstream discussion.
>>      Commit message update.
>>
>> v3: This is a new patch. Patch addresses the upstream comment to enable
>>      ABMC feature by default if the feature is available.
>> ---
>>   arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> index b0cce3dfd062..a8d21b0b2054 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> @@ -2932,6 +2932,46 @@ static void schemata_list_destroy(void)
>>   	}
>>   }
>>   
>> +/*
>> + * Called when a new group is created. If "mbm_cntr_assign" mode is enabled,
>> + * counters are automatically assigned. Each group can accommodate two counters:
>> + * one for the total event and one for the local event. Assignments may fail
>> + * due to the limited number of counters. However, it is not necessary to fail
>> + * the group creation and thus no failure is returned. Users have the option
>> + * to modify the counter assignments after the group has been created.
>> + */
>> +static void rdtgroup_assign_cntrs(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
>> +{
>> +	struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3].r_resctrl;
>> +
>> +	if (!resctrl_arch_mbm_cntr_assign_enabled(r))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (is_mbm_total_enabled())
>> +		rdtgroup_assign_cntr_event(r, rdtgrp, NULL, QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID);
>> +
>> +	if (is_mbm_local_enabled())
>> +		rdtgroup_assign_cntr_event(r, rdtgrp, NULL, QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Called when a group is deleted. Counters are unassigned if it was in
>> + * assigned state.
>> + */
>> +static void rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
>> +{
>> +	struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_L3].r_resctrl;
>> +
>> +	if (!resctrl_arch_mbm_cntr_assign_enabled(r))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (is_mbm_total_enabled())
>> +		rdtgroup_unassign_cntr_event(r, rdtgrp, NULL, QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID);
>> +
>> +	if (is_mbm_local_enabled())
>> +		rdtgroup_unassign_cntr_event(r, rdtgrp, NULL, QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID);
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int rdt_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc)
>>   {
>>   	struct rdt_fs_context *ctx = rdt_fc2context(fc);
>> @@ -2991,6 +3031,8 @@ static int rdt_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc)
>>   		if (ret < 0)
>>   			goto out_mongrp;
>>   		rdtgroup_default.mon.mon_data_kn = kn_mondata;
>> +
>> +		rdtgroup_assign_cntrs(&rdtgroup_default);
> 
> I think counters should be assigned *before* the files exposing them
> are added to resctrl.

Sure.

> 
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	ret = rdt_pseudo_lock_init();
>> @@ -3021,8 +3063,10 @@ static int rdt_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc)
>>   out_psl:
>>   	rdt_pseudo_lock_release();
>>   out_mondata:
>> -	if (resctrl_arch_mon_capable())
>> +	if (resctrl_arch_mon_capable()) {
>> +		rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs(&rdtgroup_default);
>>   		kernfs_remove(kn_mondata);
> 
> ... and here remove the files before taking away the data exposed by them.

Sure.

> 
>> +	}
>>   out_mongrp:
>>   	if (resctrl_arch_mon_capable())
>>   		kernfs_remove(kn_mongrp);
>> @@ -3201,6 +3245,7 @@ static void free_all_child_rdtgrp(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
>>   
>>   	head = &rdtgrp->mon.crdtgrp_list;
>>   	list_for_each_entry_safe(sentry, stmp, head, mon.crdtgrp_list) {
>> +		rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs(sentry);
>>   		free_rmid(sentry->closid, sentry->mon.rmid);
>>   		list_del(&sentry->mon.crdtgrp_list);
>>   
>> @@ -3241,6 +3286,8 @@ static void rmdir_all_sub(void)
>>   		cpumask_or(&rdtgroup_default.cpu_mask,
>>   			   &rdtgroup_default.cpu_mask, &rdtgrp->cpu_mask);
>>   
>> +		rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs(rdtgrp);
>> +
>>   		free_rmid(rdtgrp->closid, rdtgrp->mon.rmid);
>>   
>>   		kernfs_remove(rdtgrp->kn);
>> @@ -3272,6 +3319,7 @@ static void rdt_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
>>   	for_each_alloc_capable_rdt_resource(r)
>>   		reset_all_ctrls(r);
>>   	rmdir_all_sub();
>> +	rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs(&rdtgroup_default);
>>   	rdt_pseudo_lock_release();
>>   	rdtgroup_default.mode = RDT_MODE_SHAREABLE;
>>   	schemata_list_destroy();
>> @@ -3280,6 +3328,7 @@ static void rdt_kill_sb(struct super_block *sb)
>>   		resctrl_arch_disable_alloc();
>>   	if (resctrl_arch_mon_capable())
>>   		resctrl_arch_disable_mon();
>> +
>>   	resctrl_mounted = false;
>>   	kernfs_kill_sb(sb);
>>   	mutex_unlock(&rdtgroup_mutex);
> 
> Unnecessary hunk.

ok

> 
>> @@ -3871,6 +3920,8 @@ static int rdtgroup_mkdir_mon(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
>>   		goto out_unlock;
>>   	}
>>   
>> +	rdtgroup_assign_cntrs(rdtgrp);
>> +
>>   	kernfs_activate(rdtgrp->kn);
>>   
>>   	/*
>> @@ -3915,6 +3966,8 @@ static int rdtgroup_mkdir_ctrl_mon(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		goto out_closid_free;
>>   
>> +	rdtgroup_assign_cntrs(rdtgrp);
>> +
>>   	kernfs_activate(rdtgrp->kn);
>>   
>>   	ret = rdtgroup_init_alloc(rdtgrp);
> 
> Please compare the above two hunks with earlier "x86/resctrl: Introduce cntr_id in mongroup for assignments".
> Earlier patch initializes the counters within mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_alloc() while the above
> hunk assigns the counters after mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_alloc() is called. Could this fragmentation be avoided
> with init done once within mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_alloc()?

It seems more appropriate to call rdtgroup_cntr_id_init() inside 
mkdir_rdt_prepare(). This will initialize the cntr_id to MON_CNTR_UNSET.

And then call rdtgroup_assign_cntrs() inside mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_alloc().

what do you think?


> 
>> @@ -3940,6 +3993,7 @@ static int rdtgroup_mkdir_ctrl_mon(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
>>   out_del_list:
>>   	list_del(&rdtgrp->rdtgroup_list);
>>   out_rmid_free:
>> +	rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs(rdtgrp);
>>   	mkdir_rdt_prepare_rmid_free(rdtgrp);
>>   out_closid_free:
>>   	closid_free(closid);
>> @@ -4010,6 +4064,9 @@ static int rdtgroup_rmdir_mon(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, cpumask_var_t tmpmask)
>>   	update_closid_rmid(tmpmask, NULL);
>>   
>>   	rdtgrp->flags = RDT_DELETED;
>> +
>> +	rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs(rdtgrp);
>> +
>>   	free_rmid(rdtgrp->closid, rdtgrp->mon.rmid);
>>   
>>   	/*
>> @@ -4056,6 +4113,8 @@ static int rdtgroup_rmdir_ctrl(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp, cpumask_var_t tmpmask)
>>   	cpumask_or(tmpmask, tmpmask, &rdtgrp->cpu_mask);
>>   	update_closid_rmid(tmpmask, NULL);
>>   
>> +	rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs(rdtgrp);
>> +
>>   	free_rmid(rdtgrp->closid, rdtgrp->mon.rmid);
>>   	closid_free(rdtgrp->closid);
>>   
> 
> There is a potential problem here. rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs() attempts to remove counter from
> all domains associated with the resource group. This may fail in any of the domains that results
> in the counter not being marked as free in the global map and not reset the counter in the
> resource group ... but the resource group is removed right after calling rdtgroup_unassign_cntrs().
> In this scenario there is thus a counter that is considered to be in use but not assigned to any
> resource group.
> 
>>From what I can tell there is a difference here between default resource group and the others:
> on remount of resctrl the default resource group will maintain knowledge of the counter that could
> not be unassigned. This means that unmount/remount of resctrl does not provide a real "clean slate"
> when it comes to counter assignment. Is this intended?
> 

Yes. Agree. It is not intended.

How about adding bitmap_zero() inside rdt_get_tree() to address this 
problem? Also need to reset the cntr_id in rdt_kill_sb().

-- 
- Babu Moger

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-22  0:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-29 23:21 [PATCH v9 00/26] x86/resctrl : Support AMD Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC) Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 01/26] x86/resctrl: Add __init attribute for the functions called in resctrl_late_init Babu Moger
2024-11-15 23:21   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-18 17:44     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-18 22:07       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-20 20:02         ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 02/26] x86/cpufeatures: Add support for Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring Counters (ABMC) Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 03/26] x86/resctrl: Add ABMC feature in the command line options Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 04/26] x86/resctrl: Consolidate monitoring related data from rdt_resource Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 05/26] x86/resctrl: Detect Assignable Bandwidth Monitoring feature details Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 06/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce resctrl_file_fflags_init() to initialize fflags Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 07/26] x86/resctrl: Add support to enable/disable AMD ABMC feature Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 08/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce the interface to display monitor mode Babu Moger
2024-11-16  0:00   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-18 19:04     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-18 22:07       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-22 18:25         ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-22 21:37           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-23  0:02             ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-25 18:17               ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-26 17:09                 ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-26 19:01                   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-26 21:57                     ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 09/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to display number of monitoring counters Babu Moger
2024-11-16  0:06   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-18 21:31     ` Moger, Babu
2025-02-03 13:26       ` Peter Newman
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 10/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce bitmap mbm_cntr_free_map to track assignable counters Babu Moger
2024-11-16  0:11   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 11/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce mbm_total_cfg and mbm_local_cfg in struct rdt_hw_mon_domain Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 12/26] x86/resctrl: Remove MSR reading of event configuration value Babu Moger
2024-11-16  0:24   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-19 16:50     ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 13/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce mbm_cntr_map to track assignable counters at domain Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 14/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to display number of free counters Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:57   ` Luck, Tony
2024-10-30 14:15     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-04 14:14   ` Peter Newman
2024-11-04 17:31     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-16  0:31   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-19 19:20     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-21 21:12       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-22 23:36         ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-25 19:00           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-26 23:31             ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-26 23:56               ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-27 14:57                 ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-27 19:05                   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-28 11:10                     ` Peter Newman
2024-11-28 19:35                       ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-29  9:59                         ` Peter Newman
2024-11-29 17:06                           ` Moger, Babu
2024-12-02 10:43                             ` Peter Newman
2024-12-02 15:02                               ` Moger, Babu
2024-12-02 18:33                             ` Reinette Chatre
2024-12-02 19:48                               ` Moger, Babu
2024-12-02 20:15                                 ` Reinette Chatre
2024-12-02 20:42                                   ` Moger, Babu
2024-12-02 21:09                                     ` Reinette Chatre
2024-12-02 21:28                                       ` Moger, Babu
2024-12-02 21:47                                         ` Reinette Chatre
2024-12-02 22:06                                           ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 15/26] x86/resctrl: Add data structures and definitions for ABMC assignment Babu Moger
2024-11-16  0:35   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 16/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce cntr_id in mongroup for assignments Babu Moger
2024-11-16  0:38   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-19 20:02     ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 17/26] x86/resctrl: Implement resctrl_arch_config_cntr() to assign a counter with ABMC Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:54   ` Luck, Tony
2024-10-30 14:14     ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-31  7:16   ` kernel test robot
2024-10-31 15:27     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-16  0:44   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-19 20:12     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-21 20:18       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-22 18:54         ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-22 21:52           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-23  0:15             ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 18/26] x86/resctrl: Add the interface to assign/update counter assignment Babu Moger
2024-11-16  0:57   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-20 18:05     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-21 20:50       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-22 21:04         ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-22 22:07           ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-23  0:09             ` Moger, Babu
2024-12-04  4:16   ` Fenghua Yu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 19/26] x86/resctrl: Add the interface to unassign a MBM counter Babu Moger
2024-11-04 14:16   ` Peter Newman
2024-11-04 18:21     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-05 10:35       ` Peter Newman
2024-11-05 19:58         ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 20/26] x86/resctrl: Auto assign/unassign counters when mbm_cntr_assign is enabled Babu Moger
2024-11-18 17:18   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-22  0:22     ` Moger, Babu [this message]
2024-11-22  0:26       ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-22 18:12         ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-22 21:34           ` Moger, Babu
2024-12-04  4:16   ` Fenghua Yu
2024-12-04 17:03     ` Reinette Chatre
2024-12-04 17:14     ` Moger, Babu
2024-12-04 17:19       ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 21/26] x86/resctrl: Report "Unassigned" for MBM events in mbm_cntr_assign mode Babu Moger
2024-11-18 17:39   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-20 19:14     ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 22/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce the interface to switch between monitor modes Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 23/26] x86/resctrl: Configure mbm_cntr_assign mode if supported Babu Moger
2024-11-18 19:23   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-20 18:59     ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 24/26] x86/resctrl: Update assignments on event configuration changes Babu Moger
2024-11-18 19:43   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-21  2:14     ` Moger, Babu
2024-11-21 20:58       ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-22 20:12         ` Moger, Babu
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 25/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to list assignment states of all the groups Babu Moger
2024-10-29 23:21 ` [PATCH v9 26/26] x86/resctrl: Introduce interface to modify assignment states of " Babu Moger
2024-11-18 21:51   ` Reinette Chatre
2024-11-21 20:29     ` Moger, Babu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3d32c528-24fb-e701-a70b-331d1a04493a@amd.com \
    --to=bmoger@amd.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jithu.joseph@intel.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=perry.yuan@amd.com \
    --cc=peternewman@google.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=xin3.li@intel.com \
    --cc=xiongwei.song@windriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.