From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Limpach Subject: Re: /proc/xen/xenbus supports watch? Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:55:07 +0100 Message-ID: <3d8eece205091405555a2871fc@mail.gmail.com> References: <5d7aca9505090801025f3d5771@mail.gmail.com> <3d8eece205090803381b818f18@mail.gmail.com> <1126226609.25110.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <3d8eece205091302422ac74f77@mail.gmail.com> <1126657264.7896.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1126689530.4415.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Reply-To: Christian.Limpach@cl.cam.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1126689530.4415.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Rusty Russell Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 9/14/05, Rusty Russell wrote: > Patch for reading only (I subbed in NULL for the default store page for > the moment, since I know there's another patch out there which touches > this). I really don't think that the multi-page approach is good and it's also orthogonal, i.e. we could have multiple connections but still want concurrent transactions on the same connection. What's wrong with concurrent transactions on the same connection? christian