From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82B942156FD; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 16:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734713015; cv=none; b=nZjhax88oVbzJw0UmWsLeBGILnybMr6y2T5iNcwy9+8FP614OSbdO3c2eud46gG0I5em9jeb1oL8vVzPRCujCbZemU5VM3mgkSDw8003qPHBVimGtFrwIVvEZgwVvEKpyqycyyTzLmY7Rf7vqPzR4V49/DPMcSlw7V4gQOUva0Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734713015; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LrgBFBJgMMLjjZl1A6YiBqDtZB7DhvV2TIDZSCAIi0E=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=fycHB7b075AI0X15MBSdy/k0ic1as8j2huUikOhS8A/CxizMTemg0JZRUaYdL5t/8WcC9wLlm9Sm/ESW94tRsb2OT9eLQ1t5c7eFVwFeClN2KILY8TXIxnj8w5zcxW/0p5GJ1WAN9bA9d5qNj5zvhOeJzMFjzh3BZ2jIVN205iI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mMQ45tiX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mMQ45tiX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B662C4CECD; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 16:43:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1734713015; bh=LrgBFBJgMMLjjZl1A6YiBqDtZB7DhvV2TIDZSCAIi0E=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=mMQ45tiXkqhUXR//v/DhYcJiqxMcBM5QOeiWvyd1/wq3bt5cU9RZKO0mGKL5v6nz3 8vLeA833BkBipKSEDer5dpjbHmVEnkeGvXtMrZbKrEgXEHJyzVcO7E+0hAaZdVHC+o To2g+KlKA8Px6/uCw5tm4070t8w8qnzyJWemXchPlxIF+D5OZmDeNS2nVZsQY6eL1Y 3/dKBCNzdk70XW/YY4e6Yrcq2MJ3EUMJjtKqDZGYXOJqF9Ze5HCarB47glHbVvOBEe QSvz+mvpMRxKoCNz2j/uxsyMHWHXJojz1EGOtTae2BlPPhb7p1BpVx/6bK21DMKiih AAx/jOXctNmCg== Message-ID: <3e493e1e-07cb-40ff-823b-d166d0261a2a@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 09:43:34 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: loongarch@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] loongarch/mm: disable WUC for pgprot_writecombine as same as ioremap_wc To: Sui Jingfeng , Shuah , Xi Ruoyao , WANG Xuerui , Icenowy Zheng , Huacai Chen Cc: Andrew Morton , "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" , Baoquan He , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , David Hildenbrand , Zhen Lei , Thomas Gleixner , Zhihong Dong , loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "conduct@kernel.org" References: <20231009042841.635366-1-uwu@icenowy.me> <4f1af31b-15be-cb47-6b34-45de1b5696be@loongson.cn> <42b0e6f6-c2b5-49c6-b1f2-0200bef913da@xen0n.name> <3641d3fe-c2e7-868f-ab0d-3951c9a78b6d@loongson.cn> <8373ccfd93b0402caf9f5c06a2d9b93b3c0d0b49.camel@xry111.site> <655c2b73-4ecf-4201-83b8-bbddfd68027e@linux.dev> Content-Language: en-US From: Shuah In-Reply-To: <655c2b73-4ecf-4201-83b8-bbddfd68027e@linux.dev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 12/17/24 20:24, Sui Jingfeng wrote: > Hi, > > > On 2024/12/18 02:18, Shuah wrote: >> On 12/2/24 09:23, Sui Jingfeng wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >> >>>> IIUC this is a hardware bug of 7A1000 and 7A2000, so the proper location >>>> of the workaround is in the bridge chip driver.  Or am I >>>> misunderstanding something? >>>> >>> >>> You are misunderstanding everything and ranting like a dog. >>> >> >> Sui Jingfeng, >> >> This is not the way to work with your fellow developers in the >> community to express disagreements. > > > I'm not expressing disagreements, but argue that the contributor > and/or talker should provide *sufficient* hardware details and > tests. Instead of pointless *ranting* in order to get harmful > patch merged. > > The discussion completely not make scene at all. > > >> I would recommend following up with an apology. >> > > I will not apology to indecent contributors and/or maintainers > like this, never. > Either way the way the wording you are using your discussion is not what is expected and understood as the code of conduct. https://docs.kernel.org/process/code-of-conduct.html thanks, -- Shuah (On behalf of the Code of Conduct Committee)