From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id JAA86962 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 09:39:37 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id JAA61641 for linux-list; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 09:35:27 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id JAA38582 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 09:35:25 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (rck@corp.home.net) Received: from poptart.corp.home.net (poptart.svr.home.net [24.0.26.24]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id JAA07448 for ; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 09:35:21 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (rck@corp.home.net) Received: from rck-lap (nt-dhcp198.media.home.net [24.0.22.198]) by poptart.corp.home.net (Netscape Messaging Server 3.54) with SMTP id AAA3A5D; Wed, 2 Jun 1999 09:35:14 -0700 Message-Id: <4.1.19990602093023.03e1b5d0@poptart> X-Sender: rck@poptart X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Wed, 02 Jun 1999 09:35:08 -0700 To: Ralf Baechle , Robert Keller From: "Robert Keller" Subject: Re: after the kernel seems to live Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com In-Reply-To: <19990528004632.B608@uni-koblenz.de> References: <4.1.19990527124423.00930cd0@mail> <4.1.19990526115716.03f65930@mail> <4.1.19990526115716.03f65930@mail> <19990527121840.T866@uni-koblenz.de> <4.1.19990527124423.00930cd0@mail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk At 12:46 AM 5/28/99 +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: >The R5000 is supported and known to work. You happen to have a >second level cache on that board? how convinced are people that the VR5000 is supported? I'm running the latest code off the linux.sgi.com cvs server and I'm getting *very* weird page faulting problems when doing the kernel/user space hazard shuffle. Its really hard to describe the problems as they are not deterministic: sometimes the right thing happens, other times I get restricted instruction exceptions... Both of these can happen on the very same kernel binary... Which of the vec0 routines should be used on the VR5K? ...robert