From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: 2.4.23 masquerading broken? Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:08:31 +0100 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <40013CBF.1080707@trash.net> References: <20031202165653.GJ615@gaast.net> <3FCCCB02.5070203@trash.net> <20040110215954.GC20706@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <40012825.60405@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wilmer van der Gaast , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Netfilter Development Mailinglist Return-path: To: Harald Welte In-Reply-To: <40012825.60405@trash.net> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Patrick McHardy wrote: > BTW: Why do we need a route lookup at all ? Couldn't we just use the > first address on dev->in_dev->ifa_list ? > I've attached two patches (2.4+2.6) to the bugtracker which change MASQUERADE to use indev->ifa_list->ifa_local. The 2.6 version is running here without problems so far. Please have a look at https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=144 . Best regards, Patrick