From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Viktors Rotanovs <viktors@rotanovs.com>
Subject: Re: 4.0 stable ?
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:07:04 +0200
Message-ID: <400271C8.9070404@rotanovs.com>
References: <1157.192.168.0.97.1073894170.squirrel@sml.dyndns.org> <16386.26113.665652.955743@laputa.namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-16451-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <16386.26113.665652.955743@laputa.namesys.com>
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com

Nikita Danilov wrote:

>Thomas Graham writes:
> > when does it stable anyway ?!
>
>It depends on your definition of stable. It is stable for ordinary use,
>and as far as I know people are using it for home directories for some
>time already. It is still possible to crash it under stress test if one
>is inventive enough and has enough time to waste.
>  
>
How many bugs were fixed since the last snapshot?
Isn't it time for a new snapshot for 2.6.1 (or 2.6.1-mm)?
I use Reiser4 as for everything on my desktop PC for several months, 
without any problems.
(currently 2.6.0 test11, Gentoo linux).
What's the status of compression support?

>Nikita.
>  
>