From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4002F072.90808@wanadoo.fr> From: Francis SOUYRI MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] which filesystem to use on slackware References: <20040110000045.98531.qmail@web80403.mail.yahoo.com> <1073693715.30384.6.camel@david.internal.NorcrossGroup.com> <1073705576.4883.5.camel@grandmother.littlebald.com> <3FFFCD6F.40107@wanadoo.fr> <20040112115400.GA29090@deepthought.hausboot.org> In-Reply-To: <20040112115400.GA29090@deepthought.hausboot.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Jan 12 14:08:02 2004 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@sistina.com Hi Jens, Jens Hoffrichter wrote: >On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:01:19AM +0100, Francis SOUYRI wrote: > > > >>With Ext3 you can grow the filesystem offline and with a kernel patch >>you can grow online, you can not shrink. >> >> >This is not true. Using resize2fs you can grow and shrink the filesystem, >but only offline. I'm not sure about the kernel-patch, but I'm certainly >sure you can shrink at least offline. And using e2fsadm in conjunction > > Excuse me yes it is possible to shrink offline an ext2 filesystem. For the online grow kernel patch there are informations at: http://ext2resize.sourceforge.net/ or http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/ For the merge of the patch in the 2.6 kernel there are informations at: http://www.kernelnewbies.org/status/latest.html or http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/716 but I can not find the patch. >with lvm is even more comfortable ;)) Although it had some issues with >ext3, as sometimes a filesystem is reported unchecked even if you have run >an e2fsck -f just right before. But adding a -f to resize2fs has always >worked for me without any trouble at all. > >I chose ext3 2 1/2 years ago, when doing kernel development for my diploma >thesis, and an occassional ooops or other crash happened almost regularily. >And waiting for the filesystem check annoyed me after the 3rd time ;) > >The argument for ext3 at this moment was, that you can easily convert an >ext2 filesystem to an ext3 filesystem using tune2fs -j (to add the journal), >and even mount the ext3 filesystem as ext2, making it available even if >you have no support for ext3 in your kernel (2 1/2 years ago quite important!) > >Ext3 has never failed me in this time, I had no failure of filesystem and >the performance was also good, at least for my needs :) > >CU all, >Jens > > Best regards. Francis