From: Yaroslav Klyukin <skintwin@mail.ru>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: SMP versus UP on P4
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:56:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40055888.4060907@mail.ru> (raw)
Hello everybody!
I have this question, which I would like to ask you guys.
I know that SMP works slower, because of thread contention and locking
mechanisms.
Does it make sence to use SMP kernel still, in case of a single P4,
or should I use UP kernel and disable Hyper-Threading in the bios?
Any benchmark results would be highly appreciated.
Thank you.
reply other threads:[~2004-01-14 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40055888.4060907@mail.ru \
--to=skintwin@mail.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.