From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Emmanuel Guiton Subject: Last minute erratum: I'm stupid. - Re: Side effect? - Re: Changing the content of tcp timeouts ... Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:29:33 +0200 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <4006A3CD.5070104@netlab.hut.fi> References: <40053873.6000806@netlab.hut.fi> <1074084643.15865.6.camel@nienna.balabit> <400542BD.6050706@netlab.hut.fi> <40064EA0.3050603@netlab.hut.fi> <1074172485.1305.21.camel@nienna.balabit> <4006A15C.7090908@netlab.hut.fi> Reply-To: emmanuel@netlab.hut.fi Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Emmanuel Guiton wrote: > KOVACS Krisztian wrote: > >> Are you sure iptable_nat is loaded in the kernel? And what does your >> kernel log say? >> >> >> > Well, as far as I've modified my sources I can't reproduce the error > immediately. But a good guess would be that the module was not loaded > and more specifically the problem may simply occured in the > ip_conntrack module, thus avoiding iptable_nat to work. > But the problem is now solved. I have not changed anything except the > name of my function which is much shorter than my original one. Now > it's working, even the execution produces the result I was expecting. > Isn't there a specific bound on the function's name? The first name I > used was 44 characters long (it was in fact a longer version of the > one I indicated in my previous mail). > > Tanks for your help anyway. > > Emmanuel > I just noticed the real cause of the problem. A syntax error in the name of my function. I thought I had checked it... Please, forget about all the previous messages. Mea culpa. Emmanuel